Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and injunction - Defendant contended that suit property was allotted to his father in partition, but he has not produced any document to show that suit property was ancestral property - Plaintiffs on the other hand proved their right and title based on Assignment Order in respect of suit property - They have..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Restraining defendants from dispossessing plaintiff or alienating or encumbering suit property - Defendants have disputed marital status of plaintiff with their deceased son and have categorically denied her claim over property or her possession thereof - Validity of marriage becomes a question of..........
Will -- Declaring Will "dubious" at interlocutory stage of deciding application for interim injunction - Trial Court ventured into midst of document, effectively prejudging an issue that ought to be tried in full evidence - This amounts to a jurisdictional error, as Courts dealing with interlocutory reliefs must confine themselves to assessing i.e prima facie case,..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 6 -- Suit filed u/s 6 of the Act is normally in the nature of summary suit - Enquiry in suit is confined to finding out possession and dispossession within a period of six months from the date of institution of suit - Question of title is not germane for consideration...........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 6 -- Suit filed u/s 6 of the Act - Validity of title is not germane for consideration in a suit u/s 6 of the Act...........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Suit for bare injunction - When plaintiff is in possession of suit property on the date of filing of suit, other than issue regarding possession in a suit for permanent injunction, Court cannot touch upon title issue - Suit rightly decreed on basis of oral and documentary evidence placed on record...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 10 -- Stay of subsequent suit - Both the parties are litigating with regard to title and ownership of suit property against each other - Whole subject matter in both the proceedings is identical - If the first suit is decided, automatically claim of defendant in subsequent suit would become barred by res judicata - Subsequent suit,..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11 -- Rejection of plaint - Bar of jurisdiction of Civil Court - Partition suit based on terms of Foreign Court Judgment - Suit is not for enforcement of divorce decree granted by Foreign Court, but is a suit for partition wherein respondent/wife asserts her rights over certain properties on basis of mutual agreement and..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11 -- Res judicata - Issue as regards to claim of defendant that he has been in occupation of property for nearly 60 years already decided against him in injunction suit filed by him - Defendant has not proved his title to property in said suit, thus his present claim is barred by principles of res-judicata...........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34 -- Suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession - Defendant had trespassed and entered upon possession of property - Even in injunction suit filed by defendant, he had admitted that he had been in possession of 100 Sq.Ft of land in Schedule-A property as a lessee only - He had not whispered his occupation of Schedule-A..........
