LawMirror.com

Results of corruption+act

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1011-1020 of 1914 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Proof - Version of appellant that PW2 came to his office and placed amount and papers on table when he was talking to 4 or 5 persons - Said version supported by DWs.1 and 2 - Normal course of conduct expected of appellant would be that he would keep amount somewhere instead of keeping..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(e) -- Offence u/s 13(1)(e) of Act - Private complaint - In the absence of a provision which bars private individual from filing such complaint, complaint is maintainable against public servant who committed such alleged offence...........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 5 -- Police investigation - It is mandatory on the part of Special Judge to apply his mind to the allegations made in complaint to find-out as to whether it discloses any offence and whether it is necessary to refer the complaint to police for investigation...........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 156(3), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 17, 13(1)(e) - - Police investigation - Special Judge has jurisdiction to direct investigation in exercise of power u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. in respect of the allegations relating to offence punishable u/s 13(1)(e) of P.C. Act only on the satisfaction that investigation is necessary and he..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 197, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1), 13(1)(d), 19, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 467, 468, 471, 420 -- Public servant - Sanction for prosecution - Sanction granted u/s 19 of Act of 1988 for offence u/s 13(1) and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act and S.420 IPC - Sanction not granted for offence u/ss 467,..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13, Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, Section 4 -- Offence prescribing minimum sentence - Held, in cases where a specific provision prescribed a minimum sentence, the provisions of Probation Act cannot be invoked...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19 -- Sanction for prosecution - Order of - Legality - Detailed reasons given for grant of prosecution sanction - Every aspect has been considered therein - Held, it cannot be said to be an order without application of mind - Sanction has been given after considering all material and evidence - No interference called for...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 5(1)(d), 5(2), 5(3A), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 161 -- Illegal gratification - Co-accused acquitted as prosecution witnesses did not transpire confidence - Conviction of appellant on the same evidence does not sound to be reasonable and correct...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19, 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) -- Offence u/ss 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) Prevention of Corruption Act - Sanction for prosecution - Sanction granted just by signing a draft for sanction - Sanction vitiated for non application of mind - However, competent authority can consider the matter afresh...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 20 -- Illegal gratification - Conviction - Validity - PWs.1 and 2 did not totally depart from basic version of prosecution - They in fact supported basic version of prosecution - If their evidence and that of PW5 is considered in its entirety it is to the effect that appellant demanded bribe of Rs.5000/- from PW1 for..........

Showing : 1011-1020 of 1914 Results