LawMirror.com

Results of set+aside+order

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1061-1070 of 11959 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complainant specifically admitted receiving of part payment of Rs.4,00,000 from accused but categorically stated that cheque issued by accused for balance amount was dishonoured - Accused failed to prove the defence taken by him - Though accused set up a case that he had not issued any cheque but no..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complainant specifically admitted receiving of part payment of Rs.4,00,000 from accused but categorically stated that cheque issued by accused for balance amount was dishonoured - Accused failed to prove the defence taken by him - Though accused set up a case that he had not issued any cheque but no..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, Section 20, 3 -- Jurisdiction of Court - Claim petition was lodged before Deputy Labour Commissioner - However, claim was not contested - Thus, claim lodged by claimants seeking compensation would not partake the character of a contested claim as stipulated under notification issued by appropriate Government u/s 20(1), (2) of the Act -..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 145(2) -- Dishonour of cheque - Right of accused to cross-examine the witness was closed on the ground that he failed to file an application u/s 145(2) of the Act - However, on the said date he was exempted from personal appearance - Accused thus, was not afforded reasonable opportunity to file application u/s 145(2) of the..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 10, Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Section 36 -- Filing of execution petition before Commercial Court where defendant resides - Well within meaning of S.36 of Act of 2015 - Order passed by Commercial Court returning back case invoking provision of O.7.R.10 CPC is patently wrong and set aside...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, Section 17 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - When a decree is passed by a Court of Small Causes ex parte u/s 17 Proviso of the Act, applicant who files an application to set aside the ex parte decree is bound to do the following: (i) he must deposit in Court, the amount due under..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227 -- Discharge - High Court while passing the discharge order did not even referred to the evidence collected by Investigating Agency produced alongwith charge sheet in its entirety - Rather there is selective reference to the statements of some of the persons recorded during investigation - It shows that there was total non..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Non appearance of accused - Issuance of non bailable warrants - Petitioner was on her family way and gave birth to a child - Non appearance was wholly unintentional - Impugned orders set aside - Liberty is granted to petitioner to appear before trial Court within a period of 15 days...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108 -- Execution - Third party objections - Evidence required to decide the same - Executing Court thus, justified in holding objections at the instance of third party to be maintainable at this stage not in the sense that a decree cannot be executed against them but in the sense..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 2, 5(a) -- Permission to sue as indigent person - Requirement of O.33 CPC is not only the schedule qua immovable property but the same also comprises of movable properties - Application decided only on the basis of immovable properties ignoring the fact that there was no proof of movable property - Impugned order set aside -..........

Showing : 1061-1070 of 11959 Results