LawMirror.com

Results of 22++9+civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1081-1090 of 1349 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 115, Order 22, Rule 4 -- Order passed U.O.22.R.4 - Revision lies...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 10-A -- Death of party defendant - Other defendants should inform plaintiff's counsel by filing a memo - In the absence of such a memo and in the absence of any adjudicable issue against such defendant, Court should strike out his name...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 3, 4 -- (As in P&H) - L.R's - There is no limitation for bringing on record the L.R's of the deceased plaintiff/defendant - L.R's are entitled to be brought on record at any time - Suit not to abate in case L.R's are not brought on record...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21 &22 -- Death of D.H. during pendency of execution - Impleading of L.R's Requirement of succession certificate - Punishment of stoppage of 5 increments set aside - Arrears of salary cannot be regarded as a debt - It is the balance amount which became due after the decree was passed in favour of the D.H. - - S.214 Succession Act is not..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 5 -- L.R's. - Substitution - A decision under O.22.R.5 CPC does not operate as res judicata between the same parties or their successors in interest or their privies, in a subsequent proceeding, even when the said parties had been provided an opportunity to contest the issue and lead the evidence thereon...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 22, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 119 -- Arbitration award - Objections not filed within 30 days of filing of award - Ex parte decree passed - O.9.R.13 CPC applies - For limitation purpose provisions of Art.119 apply...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 5, 9 -- Eviction petition - Son as sub lessee impleaded as a party - Death of tenant - Son as sub lessee and L.R. of tenant fulfils both capacities - No question of abatement of petition - Application of son for abatement rightly dismissed...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2000
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 3 -(As in P&H) - L.R's - Impleadment - Limitation - There is no limitation for making an application for impleading L.Rs. after amendment in O.22.R.3 by Punjab and Haryana High Court - The lis of the parties should not fail on technicalities and procedural wrangles...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2000
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 144, Order 22, Rule 10 -- Restitution - Transferee pendente lite - Remedy of restitution is available against transferee pendente lite also - A transferee pendente lite is a representative of the transferor and is also a person bound by the decree, even though he is not made a party to the suit or appeal...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2000
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 22, Rule 10 -- Execution - Impleading of New Managing Partner of D.H. firm in execution - Allowed...........

Showing : 1081-1090 of 1349 Results