LawMirror.com

Results of revision%2bof%2b304a

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1151-1160 of 2853 Results

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Revision against the impugned order on behalf of respondents 1 and 2-OPs was dismissed on ground of limitation as well as on merits - Plea that since the revision petition against the same order was dismissed the order of Fora below stands confirmed hence revision by the..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Revision against the impugned order on behalf of respondents 1 and 2-OPs was dismissed on ground of limitation as well as on merits - Plea that since the revision petition against the same order was dismissed the order of Fora below stands confirmed hence revision by the..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of written statement - Suit for eviction - Tenant did not claim benefit of S.20 (4) of the Act - Suit decreed - In revision tenant moved application seeking amendment in the written statement to take plea of S.20 of U.P. Act of 1972 - Held, proposed amendment would frustrate mandatory condition of depositing rent..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Conviction - Validity - Legal notice was sent by complainant - Accused did not reply the same - Accused did not dispute issuance of cheque by adducing any oral or documentary evidence - Held, no error on the part of Courts below in drawing concurrent findings, on the execution of cheque and passing of..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) -- Revision - Condonation of delay - Delay of 325 days - Reasoning assigned are the procedural delays that usually occurs with governmental organizations for no one seriously pursuing the matter - The reasoning assigned held to be hardly said to be reasonable, satisfactory or even excuse for delay - The expression `sufficient..........

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 17(1)(b), 24 -- B - Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000, Rule 6(1) - Maharashtra Official Languages Act, 1964, Sections 3,4,5 - Constitution of India, Articles 345,350 - Suo motu revision - Language of District Forum - Official language - As per the provision of Rule 6(1) of the Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules,2000 the..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, Section 9, 23, 39 -- Pay scales - Revision of pay scales - Employees of Haryana Financial corporation - Instructions by Government - Policy decision - Respondent No.3 - Haryana Financial Corporation has taken a conscious decision that the petitioner are entitled to parity of pay with their counterparts serving in Government Department..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, Section 39 -- Haryana Financial Corporation, in its Board meeting, on recommendation of Managing Direction, decided to revise pay scale of its employees - Decision of Board communicated to Govt. for necessary approval - However, Govt. rejected recommendation - Held, only in policy matters relating to financial affairs of corporation,..........

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 115, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1 -- Suit for partition - Material on record indicated place in which possession of disputed land was declared in favour of defendant No.1 by Magistrate - Sessions Judge reversed order of Magistrate and order was further challenged by way of revision in High Court - A compromise was effected in..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 35, 35A, 35B -- Cost - Revision filed by statutory authority i.e. HUDA after delay of 2-1/2 years - Delay not explained - Revision dismissed in limni with special costs of Rs.20, 000/- Held, though ordinarily Courts adopt liberal approach in matter of condonation of delay and have shown extra latitude and..........

Showing : 1151-1160 of 2853 Results