LawMirror.com

Results of 22++9+civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1171-1180 of 1349 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 9, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4(2) -- Minor attaining majority during pendency of suit - Minor acquired rights of tenancy - To safeguard the interest of minor he is allowed to file additional written statement...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11, Order 21, Rule 22, 23 -- Order passed under O.21.R.23(2) operates as res judicata in all further proceedings - If notice under Order 21 Rule 22 is not given objection to executability can be raised at a later stage...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 22 -- Objections - Envisaged by R.22 are objections in regard to the executability of the decree and not with regard to the validity of the decree...........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 9 -- Partition suit - Appeal - Death of appellant during pendency of appeal - Defendant No.1 transposed as appellant - Stubborn attitude and conduct of petitioner - Inspite of objections raised legal representatives of deceased appellant not substituted and defendant No.1 claimed himself to be sole representative - Substitution of..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4, 10-A -- Counsel to inform Court on death of party he represents and thereupon Court gives notice of such death to the other party - Application filed within 30 days of the date of knowledge of the death of the respondent - Held, there is no abatement of appeal...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22 -- Two respondents died during pendency of second appeal - L.R's not impleaded - Appeal stands abated as against them - Held, where the decree is single and indivisible, there cannot be inconsistent decrees as against the deceased respondents and the contesting surviving respondents - Appeal dismissed...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 -- Death of one of the respondents - Legal representatives and heirs of deceased respondent could not be brought on record due to mistake of Court - Party cannot be penalised for it - Court allowed substitution of L.R's by condoning delay - Held, such order not to be interfered with..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 141, Order 22 -- Applicability of the provisions to proceedings under Article 226 and 227 Constitution of India - Provisions are not applicable - However, the High Court has got all the powers under Article 226 and 227 itself to pass any order which can be passed under Order 22 CPC to substitute legal heirs or L.R's of deceased parties..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1995
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 21 -- Suit filed against dead person - Amendment of plaint to substitute his heirs - The test to be applied in such a case, is whether the mistake in filing the suit was made in good faith or it is on account of any neglect or contumacy to the conduct..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 1995
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 10 -- Alienation/assignment by one party inspite of restraint order - Assignees cannot claim to be impleaded as parties on basis of assignment...........

Showing : 1171-1180 of 1349 Results