Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 143A -- Dishonour of cheque - Interim compensation - Provision u/s 143-A of the Act is directory and not mandatory...........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 143A -- Dishonour of cheque - Interim compensation - Cheque in question involved a huge amount of Rs.14,08,000 - Plea of fraud taken by accused in his reply to application u/s 143-A of the Act has not been examined deeply or if noticed not been appreciated by Courts below by recording reasons - Order directing payment of..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366A, 376(2), 354A(1)(i)(2), (D), Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 4, 7, 8, 11(iii), 12 -- Kidnapping and rape - Victim admits that she is aged about 18 years - She has not stated anything about subjecting her for forcible sexual act and evidence of father of victim is nothing but hearsay - There is no medical..........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139, 118 -- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Complaint by power of attorney holder - When attorney is totally unaware as to how when and why cheque was issued, he cannot prove execution merely on the basis of available record - Presumption will arise only when execution of cheque is proved - If complainants witness has no..........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Complaint by power of attorney holder - Power of attorney holder being an authorized representative of company, can file a complaint and give evidence but he must have either witnessed transaction or must possess direct knowledge of transaction...........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Complaint by power of attorney holder - A person who only became associated with company after transaction and who relies purely on records, cannot prove execution of cheque or transaction...........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Complaint by power of attorney holder - No specific averment in complaint that attorney holder witnessed the transaction as an agent of company or that he is having knowledge regarding transactions and execution of cheque - His proof affidavit shows that he became conversant with facts of case..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 365, 395, 34 -- Offence u/ss 365, 395, 34 IPC - Incident took place in the year 2017 - Nine years have elapsed - A3 and A5 were aged about 21 years and 24 years, respectively, when incident took place - No materials on record to show as to what was the result of case against remaining accused persons - A3 and A5 have no criminal antecedents..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302 -- Murder - Number of injuries is not determining factor for ascertaining intention...........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 304(Part I) -- Nature of offence - Incident occurred over a very trivial issue of filling of water from hand pump and getting hand pump muddy - There was no premeditation and act was done in a heat of passion - None of PWs in their deposition have stated that appellant after injured had fallen down had inflicted any further injury when..........
