LawMirror.com

Results of company

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1331-1340 of 3425 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Director - Vicarious liability - It is necessary to specifically aver in a complaint u/s 141 that at the time the offence was committed, the person accused was in charge of, and responsible for the conduct of business of the company - This averment is an essential requirement of Section..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 389 -- Appeal - Grant of bail - Conviction for offence u/s 302/34 of IPC - Statement of mother of deceased is corroborated by two witnesses PW2 and PW3 - No reason for false implication of appellants - Deceased had worked at field of accused for only 2 to 3 hours and thereafter left the place - Deceased was in company of appellant..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 499, 500, 501, 502, 34, 5, 7 - - Defamation - Quashing of complaint - Prosecution of Chairperson and Managing Director of publication company - No specific averments in complaint against them - Allegations made by complainant are prima facie vague and based on presumptions - Held, in absence of..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by company - Prosecution of directors - Quashing of - There is no specific, clear and unambiguous allegations as to how and in what manner petitioner was responsible for conduct of business - No specific role assigned to petitioner in respect of..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 149 -- Accident - Contributory negligence - Travelling on roof top of bus - One passenger lost his life - Liability of insurance company - Held, travelling on roof top of bus does not absolve Insurance company of its liability - Insurance Company is liable to indemnify insured to pay compensation even in respect of claims arising out of..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by company - Summoning of director - Legality - In title of petition, as also in affidavit supporting it, petitioner has stated himself to be director of company - If petitioner had resigned from directorship of company way back on 27.07.2010, then it was not understandable as to how he..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 27, Companies Act, 1956, Section 5 -- Complaint against Director of Company alleging deficiency of service - On death of such Direction execution proceedings initiated against petitioner, daughter of Director who was also one of the Directors for non compliance of order of Consumer Forum -..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by company - Quashing of proceedings - Held, in order to invoke S.141 of NI Act, necessary averments should be found in complaint, u/s 138 of NI Act - Purpose of issuing notice to accused for compliance of demand made therein is not for fastening..........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by company - Prosecution of Director - Quashing of - Except in the cause title there are no averments and allegations in complaint that applicant No.2 was Director of company who has issued the cheque - Apart from that even there are no further..........

CHANDIGARH CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer -Commercial purpose - Car - Manufacturing defect - Contention by OP that the complainant is a Company which is running its commercial business and the vehicle also was purchased for a -'commercial purpose-' - Not the case of complainant if the vehicle was purchased by it for the use of the Director or any other..........

Showing : 1331-1340 of 3425 Results