LawMirror.com

Results of section+439+cr +p +c

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1361-1370 of 1509 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1985
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 35B -- Non-payment of costs on the date next following date of order of payment of costs - Issue neither raised by either of the parties or taken notice of by Court - Cannot be raised on every subsequent date to press into service provisions of Section 35-B...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1985
Details

Punjab Gram Panchayat Act, 1992, Section 42(1) -- Gram Panchayat convicted two persons under Section 379 I. P. C. (found cutting branches of shehtoot (mulberry) tree belonging to Gram Panchayat and thereafter removed cut branches of tree) and directed to pay fine, revision against which dismissed by Chief Judicial Magistrate - One of the two persons a public servant - Gram..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1985
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 35B, 11, Order 9, Rule 8, 9 -- Suit for partition - Preliminary decree passed - Application for passing final decree dismissed under Section 35-B - Subsequently second application for passing final decree Not barred - As long as property remains joint, decree-holder entitled to claim its partition - Even a separate suit subsequently for..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1985
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint in pre-emption case - Amendment to plead application of Section 15(2) Punjab Pre-emption Act vis a-vis shares of female vendors and also to clarify in plaint that plaintiff son of husband's brother of certain vendors and brother's son of another vendor - Relationship which plaintiff wants to bring out in..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1985
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Cannot be issued against a statutory authority performing its statutory functions - Contrary to spirit of Section 31 Specific Relief Act to grant injunction to restrain a statutory authority to stop obeying mandate of law which created it - Injunction cannot be granted to restrain any person from..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT FULL BENCH

Year of decision: 1985
Details

Punjab Gram Panchayat Act, 1992, Section 23, 21 -- No power with Gram Panchayat to impose a prospective recurring penalty at first stage of conviction for breach of its order made absolute under Section 21 - Fine cannot be imposed for a breach which has yet to take place in future - Neither on principle nor on precedent any scope for doubting correctness of view expressed..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1985
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 2(2), Order 41, Rule 3A, Rule 9 - - Order dismissing appeal after dismissal of application under Section 5 Limitation Act - Not a decree within meaning of Section 2(2) of Code - Not open to Court to extend meaning of word "decree" and include in it other kind of orders though they are similar to orders expressly included in the..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1985
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 1, 10, 13 -- Objection in written statement that suit liable to be dismissed because of no, impleading of State a necessary party - Application under Order 23 Rule 1 for withdrawing suit with permission to file a fresh one-Allowed since State a necessary party and suit against State..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1985
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 80 -- Want of notice - A technical defect - Provisions of Section 80 express, explicit and mandatory and admit of no implications or exceptions...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1985
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 148, Order 20, Rule 14 - - Deposit of sale price less by Re. 1/- by pre-emptor-decree-holder - Decree-holder deposited amount from time to time as directed by Court - Absolutely no reason why decree-holder would not have deposited Re. 1/- unless it was due to a mistake - Mistake a bona fide one - Court ought to exercise its discretionary..........

Showing : 1361-1370 of 1509 Results