LawMirror.com

Results of m+v+act

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1391-1400 of 2892 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, Section 2(b), 4 -- Maintenance to father - Granted Rs.2,500/- p.m. alongwith a room in house - Amount allowed, held, reasonable - No interference...........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 404 -- Dishonest misappropriation of property possessed by deceased person at time of his death - Accused misused A.T.M. Card of deceased after taking same in his possession from her belongings - Since code number of card was written with pencil on back, accused was successful in withdrawing Rs.20,000/- from account of deceased - Pictures..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 18, 54 -- Land acquisition - Compensation - Annual increase - In the case M/s Kohli Holdings, Single Judge granted an increase at a flat rate of 15% per annum on the price of land with an addition of 30% on account of special locational advantage - However, no discernible reason given for granting benefit of annual increase at different..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 409, 477A, Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, Section 10, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 47 -- Breach of trust and falsification of accounts - Proof - Accused No.1, G.M. of Canbank Mutual Fund (CMF) allegedly with dishonest and fraudulent intention induced CMF to part with Rs.32.50 lakhs by..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 149, 300 -- Murder - Unlawful assembly - Proof - Held, for resorting to provisions of S.149 IPC, prosecution has to establish that - (i) there was an assembly of five persons - (ii) assembly had a common object - (iii) said common object was to consist one or more of the five illegal objects specified in S.141 IPC - In present case, there..........

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302 -- Murder - Proof - Circumstantial evidence - On 21.02.2008 around 2:30 P.M. deceased met his death in court-yard of accused person who is his own so, i, law - Death of deceased homicidal in nature - Though there were two cut wounds on body of deceased yet death was mainly occasioned by a huge cut wound on neck of deceased - Soon after..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3 -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Occurrence took place about 1.30 A.M - Deceased found lying dead on his bed - Accused/appellants lived with him in his house and were present at the time incident took place - Accused `P' made a statement u/s.27 of Evidence Act and led police to recover weapon of..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 340, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 193 -- False evidence - Witness stated before police that accused entered bar of hotel at 2 A.M. in the night and asked for drink - Deceased who was serving liquor informed accused that liquor was not available - Feeling annoyed accused took out pistol from his Pant and fired one shot at ceiling..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Medical and Occular Evidence -- Time of death - Post mortem took place at 4.30 p.m. on 20th April - Duration after death reported by doctor to be about one day old - Medical opinion that incident might have happened at 4.30 p.m. on 19th April or at the most upto six hours thereafter - Prosecution story that incident took place on 20th April at 7.30 a.m. - Duration of time..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Quashing of proceedings - As per averments made in complaint petitioner has issued cheques to complainant under his signature - Plea of petitioner that cheque in question was signed by `M' and not signed by him, therefore, he ought not to have been..........

Showing : 1391-1400 of 2892 Results