LawMirror.com

Results of jurisdiction consumer forum

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 141-150 of 301 Results

UTTARAKHAND CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DEHRADUN

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Jurisdiction -- Insurance claim - Allegations of fraud and misrepresentation - This could not have been decided without elaborate evidence and inquiry - It cannot be decided by Consumer Forums - Complaint rightly dismissed by the District Forum with liberty to file civil suit before Court of competent jurisdiction...........

CHHATTISGARH CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANDRI, RAIPUR

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Banking Service -- Alleged embezzlement, misappropriation and fraud perpetrated by employee of bank with many of the accounts holders - The complex and disputed questions involved in the complaints - Cannot be adjudicated in the exercise of summary jurisdiction by the Consumer Fora - The refusal to pay the amount to the complainants by the respondent Bank cannot be said..........

UTTAR PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, LUCKNOW

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2),(b) -- Territorial jurisdiction - Purchase of Mahindra jeep from Jabalpur in (M.P.) - Deficiency in service alleged and complaint filed before Varansi District Forum - There are more than one opposite parties with their addresses of different places - They are also carrying on business as per the own mention of the complainant..........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 3,14, Chit Fund Act, 1982, Section 64(3) -- Chit fund - Jurisdiction - District Forum has jurisdiction to entertain the complaint - Bar under Section 64(3) of Chit Fund Act, 1982, is applicable to civil courts only and not to other redressal agencies like the Forums under the Act...........

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A -- Limitation - Vehicle defective - Complainant purchased vehicle on 26.5.1995 - Complaint filed on 12.3.1999 alleging defect after 4 years of purchasing the vehicle - Complaint held to be barred by limitation - District Forum wrongly allowed the complaint, the same being without jurisdiction...........

TAMIL NADU CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MADRAS

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2), 14 -- Necessary party - Territorial jurisdiction - Tour and travel - Tour programme booked by first respondent M/s.Cox & Kings (India) Ltd. Chennai - Complaint filed by petitioners alleging deficiency in service at Chennai - Plea of absence of territorial jurisdiction by first respondent and application moved for impleadment of..........

CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAIPUR

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),d), Railways Act, 1989, Section 1989, 124A,123(c), Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, Section 15 -- Railways services - Jurisdictional bar - Complainant fell into pit on platform - Sustained injuries - Seeking compensation under CP Act - Contention of OP/railways that Railway Claims Tribunal has the jurisdiction only -..........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 27 -- Penalties - Bailable warrants - Issuance of by the District Forum - Jurisdiction- In exercise of its power under Section 27 of the Act District Forum issued order of bailable warrants against the Managing Director/ Directors of the Company for securing their presence - Powers of Judicial Magistrate first class have been..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14 -- Complaint filed in Consumer Forum - Finding of State Commission that dispute is not governed by Consumer Protection Act and liberty given to approach civil Court - Held, Consumer Forum is very much a Court of civil jurisdiction and the proceedings before the Consumer Forum are civil proceedings - Period spent in litigation in consumer..........

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 17 -- Pecuniary jurisdiction - Housing - Complaint claiming possession of flat by complainant-purchaser consideration amount of which is Rs. 1,01,565/- as agreed by both parties - Complaint filed in th year 2001 before State Committee - The consideration agreed less than Rs. 5 lakhs thus below pecuniary limit of jurisdiction of State..........

Showing : 141-150 of 301 Results