East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i) -- Bonafide requirement - Landlord requiring tenanted shop for his unemployed son who is settled abroad and also wants to settle himself in a business as he stood retired from the Govt. service - Tenant resisted petition alleging that both sons of landlord are well settled - Held, every citizen as well as..........
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 14(1)(e) -- Landlord getting ownership of tenanted premises by way of Will - Landlord filing eviction application on the ground of bonafide requirement - Tenant disputed ownership of landlord on the ground that no probate of the Will obtained - Held, tenant cannot dispute title of landlord - Tenant is a stranger to the Will and as such..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)(a) -- Bonafide requirement - Landlord having more than one premises - Cannot be expected not to manage his or her properties to extract maximum benefit and to deny him or her the right to get the tenanted premises vacated merely because some other property had been let out at a point of time which was..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)(a) -- Bonafide requirement - Immediately prior to retirement eviction petition filed - There is also no doubt that she is residing in a portion which is distinct from the commercial premises which are in possession of the tenant-petitioner and which she seeks to have for her own use and occupation - Tenant..........
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 14(1)(b) -- Sub letting - Premises let out to Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) - DTC parted with the possession of the tenanted premises to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) - MCD paying monthly rent to DTC - Held it was sub letting - Petition for ejectment allowed...........
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 2,13 -- Landlord filed eviction petition saying that demised premises let out vide lease deed for non-residential purposes without obtaining permission of RC and that he requires tenanted premises for his personal use and occupation - Held, non-residential building can be got vacated by landlord only for..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(iii) -- Eviction of tenant sought on the ground that tenanted premises had become unfit and unsafe for human habitation - Report of building expert indicated the age of building as 100 years and thus having become unfit and unsafe for human habitation - Tenant raised plea that petition is malicious as landlord did..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)(a) -- Landlord running commission agent business and seeking eviction of tenant from the shop to start business of karyana merchant - Held, Rent Controller shall not proceed to presume that the alleged need is not bonafide when landlord required tenanted premises to expand his business - His need must be..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B -- NRI landlord sought eviction of tenant on the ground of personal necessity - Tenant contended that landlord was in possession of other shops as well in the vicinity out of which four shops were lying vacant and consequently, the need of landlord, could not be said to genuine - Contention of tenant held..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(iii) -- Eviction of tenant sought on the ground that tenanted premises had become unfit and unsafe for human habitation - Tenant contended that vacant plot was let out to him whereover he raised residential building about 30 years back - Thus, tenant took plea that vacant plot does not fall within the definition..........
