LawMirror.com

Results of order+9+rule+4+civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1531-1540 of 10994 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125 -- Maintenance - Default in payment - Directions issued to all Magistrates/Family Courts across the State of Rajasthan seized of applications u/s 125 Cr.P.C that: (i) after passing of order, Court shall facilitate claimant to move an application for recovery of maintenance amount on the same day when application is decided; (ii)..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1 -- Written statement - Commercial suit - Written statement not filed within prescribed period - Written statement filed after ex parte order was set aside - Application filed by plaintiff to strike off defence decided subsequently - There is no provision that written statement, if already filed, must be struck off from the record..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Application filed u/s 311 Cr.P.C. on behalf of complainant seeking his recall and re-examination has been dismissed - In present case, complainant who seeks to re-examine himself to bring on record documents which were admitted by him during..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, 209, 465, Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957, Section 21, 23, 4(1) -- Quashing of criminal proceedings - Application for - Allegations of illegal export of iron ore - Appellant challenging order of cognizance of offence under MMDR Act after lapse of 2 years without giving reason to explain inordinate delay..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of written statement - Delay of 9 years in seeking amendment - Amendment sought was available to defendant at the time of cross examination of PWs 1 & 2 but at that time no question was put to the witnesses - Moreover specific averment in plaint was stated in written statement as not admitted and that it is for..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 92 -- Leave to file suit u/s 92 CPC - Order passed on an application u/s 92 CPC is not required to be a speaking order though it should disclose application of mind...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 92, 115 -- Grant of leave to file suit u/s 92 CPC - Revision - Maintainability - Order granting leave u/s 92 CPC does not decide any rights of parties and is made at the stage before suit comes into being - It is thus, open to petitioner to apply for revocation of leave of Court as granted by impugned order - But revision against such..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Dismissal of application by first appellate Court - Second appeal filed against such order and not against order dismissing first appeal - Order dismissing application for condonation of delay is not a decree and in the true sense it is only a formal order - Second appeal..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 145, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Application of accused for striking off evidence has been dismissed - Quashing of order - If complainant is not allowed to file detailed affidavit, then the purpose and purport of provisions contained in NI Act would be rendered to be a nullity and the..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Stay order - Single judge while granting stay order neither discussed existence of a prima facie case in favour of petitioner, nor discussed balance of convenience, nor discussed irreparable loss that would be caused to petitioner in case stay was not granted by Court - Impugned order is a non-speaking order - Impugned..........

Showing : 1531-1540 of 10994 Results