East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13A -- Bonafide requirement - Two rooms let out to tenant in the residential building for running a clinic - Two room let out in residential building for non residential purpose fall within the definition of non residential building which cannot be got vacated u/s 13-A of the Act...........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B, 18A -- NRI landlord seek eviction of tenant on ground of bonafide requirement - Premises let out by landlord and his attorney - Tenant denied relationship of landlord and tenant and took further objection that attorney through whom eviction application filed could not state about the bonafide requirement of..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(iii) -- Impairing of Value and Utility of demised premises - Landlord making barsati (temporary structure) on the roof of his house - Tenant converted it into a pucca room without the consent of landlord - Temporary structure was made for the purpose of keeping cots and drying the clothes and by converting it into..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(2)(i) -- Eviction on the ground of arrears of rent - Tenant denying relationship of landlord and tenant and also asserting that he has paid entire rent without obtaining any receipt - Held, in such a case Rent Controller is not required to assess the rent and to give opportunity to tender the same - Tenant liable to..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13 -- Sub letting - Alleged sub tenant not arrayed as a party in eviction petition - Held, sub tenant is not a necessity party, although he might be in possession of demised premises - Landlord is dominus litus - He cannot be compelled to file litigation with sub tenant...........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13 -- Sub letting - Tenant failed to demonstrate that he is transacting any business, as also failed to show his exclusive possession or his existence in the demised premises - Held, subletting of demised premises is adequately proved...........
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 2(d), 14(2) -- Eviction petition - Landlord - Locus standi - According to petitioner, respondent No.1 has sold his share in building in question, therefore, he has no locus-standi to file petition - In reply to eviction petition, petitioners have not taken specific plea regarding locus-standi - It is not the case of..........
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13(3)(a)(i) -- Bonafide requirement - Respondent landlord registered school society required demised premises to set up library room, computer room, staff room etc. - Tenant contended that the Society had sold some shops after these were got vacated - Held, merely because some shops were sold by the Society to..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(iii) -- Eviction of tenant sought on the ground that tenanted premises had become unfit and unsafe for human habitation - Report of building expert indicated the age of building as 100 years and thus having become unfit and unsafe for human habitation - Tenant raised plea that petition is malicious as landlord did..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)(a) -- Landlord running commission agent business and seeking eviction of tenant from the shop to start business of karyana merchant - Held, Rent Controller shall not proceed to presume that the alleged need is not bonafide when landlord required tenanted premises to expand his business - His need must be..........
