LawMirror.com

Results of right of subsequent purchaser

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 151-160 of 281 Results

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Punjab Land Reforms Act, 1972, Section 3, 4(5) -- Allotment of surplus land - Rival claims before authority between a person who had been an allottee of property treated as surplus under Land Revenue Act and person who claimed as purchaser from original big land owner whose land holding was declared as surplus of ceiling limit - However, sale was made subsequent to..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 19, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 53A -- Subsequent purchaser - Right of a subsequent purchaser for consideration having no notice of earlier contract is not affected in an action brought by the person who was put in possession of property under an earlier written contract...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 109 -- Tenancy - Subsequent purchaser - Transferee automatically steps into the shoes of transferor and possesses all rights which the transferor had - When there is automatic attornment of tenancy in favour of the subsequent purchaser of the property, there is no need for the tenant to approach the subsequent purchaser for the said..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 149 -- Motor accident - Tribunal fastened liability on registered owner who claims that he had already transferred vehicle - Subsequent purchaser also arrayed as party - Held, in a claim emanating from third party, order of Tribunal passing award against registered owner and also providing right of recovery against subsequent purchaser,..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 52 -- Execution - Objections - A subsequent purchaser of the suit property from the judgment debtor would certainly be a `representative' of the said judgment debtor for the purposes of execution of the decree and would be covered by Section 47 CPC...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Co-sharers -- Demolition of construction made by a co-sharer in excess of his share - When subsequent purchaser is not resisting claim of co-sharers to satisfy their share and if necessary even from the construction then order of demolition is not in accordance with justice and equity nor on a proper consideration of balance of convenience between the parties...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 56, 81 -- Marshalling by subsequent purchaser raised at appellate stage - Plea of marshalling being pure question of law based upon the decree obtained for specific performance, cannot simply be thrown out merely because the same was not specifically pleaded...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 19(b) -- Subsequent purchaser for valuable consideration without notice of the prior agreement to sell - Appellant in possession of the suit land as a mortgagee - This fact also mentioned in the sale deed in favour of subsequent purchaser - Question of subsequent purchaser for value and paid money in good faith without notice does not..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 1, 2 -- Attorney - Evidence as regards personal knowledge - (a) An attorney holder who has signed the plaint and instituted the suit, but has no personal knowledge of the transaction can only give formal evidence about the validity of the power of attorney and the filing of the suit; (b) If the attorney holder has done any act or..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 157, 166 -- Accident - Compensation - Liability fastened on insurance company - Insurance company raised challenge that at the time of accident the vehicle had been sold and the subsequent purchaser had not informed the insurance company as such company is not liable as subsequent purchaser was a stranger and not privy to the contract of..........

Showing : 151-160 of 281 Results