LawMirror.com

Results of decree challenge

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 161-170 of 236 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 10, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3-A -- Return of plaint - Compromise decree - Separate suit to challenge compromise decree not maintainable - Question of return of plaint does not arise as a separate suit itself is not maintainable whether in the same Court or in any another Court - What is barred is a 'separate..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3-A -- Maintainability of separate suit to challenge compromise decree - Plea not taken - Held, Court can suo moto decide the question of jurisdiction even in the absence of such a plea...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consent decree -- Self acquired property - Locus standi to challenge - Consent decree suffered in favour of one son - Other son ignored - Decree challenged by widow and daughter of other son - Property being self acquired, owner had every right to deal with it in any manner - Neither the other son nor his legal heirs have any locus or claim with regard to self acquired..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Concurrent finding of Courts below that decree was obtained by fraud and misrepresentation - Not open to challenge in second appeal...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consent decree -- Challenge as to - Fee of Advocate engaged on behalf of defendant paid by plaintiff - Nothing unusual as the parties were consenting to the decree...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consent decree -- Challenge as to - Plaintiff (Defendant in the previous suit) sought to dispute the proceedings recorded in Court admitting the claim of plaintiff - Held, proceeding of the Court carry the presumption of correctness and the same cannot be permitted to be disputed, more so after long lapse of time...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consent decree -- Challenge as to - Plaintiff (Defendant in the previous suit) cannot wriggle out of the same by merely stating that he had agreed to suffer a consent decree in favour of all the sons of one `K' whereas the decree has been passed in favour of only two sons...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consent decree -- Challenge as to - Plaintiff (Defendant in the previous suit) in cultivating possession at the time of passing of decree - Beneficiaries of decree nephews - Plaintiff used to live with the defendants and the last rites also performed by defendants - Held, cultivation of land by plaintiff after the decree does not create doubt over the decree passed...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consent decree -- Challenge as to - Family settlement - Particulars not disclosed either in the previous suit or in the present suit - Defendants nephews of the deceased plaintiff - Being members of the family, defendants have a pre-existing right in the estate of plaintiff, particularly when plaintiff had no issue - Plaintiff dying issuless as such nephews are the nearest..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1 -- Withdrawal of suit - Challenge to execution of sale deed - Original suit for declaration of title and injunction - Said suit was withdrawn - No liberty to file fresh suit granted - Order allowing withdrawal cannot constitute a decree - It cannot debar the defendant from taking the defence in the second round of litigations..........

Showing : 161-170 of 236 Results