Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 47, Rule 1 -- Review - High Court exceeded scope of review jurisdiction as if it was sitting in appeal over earlier judgment - To justify exercise of review jurisdiction, error must be self evident - Even assuming that there was no correct appreciation of facts and law in challenge to decision in earlier judgment, parties could be left to..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 47, Rule 1 -- Review - Every error whether factual or legal cannot be made subject matter of review U.O.47.R.1 CPC, though it can be made subject matter of appeal arising out of such order - However, in order to attract provision of O.47.R.1 CPC, error/mistake must be apparent on the face of record of case...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47 -- Execution - Objections - Sale of property - Money suit - Entire decretal amount admittedly was paid by defendant/JD from time to time though in installments - In such circumstances, it would not be feasible to sell the property of JD - Court committed error in review petition by stating that entire decretal amount was not paid by..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 47, Rule 1 -- Review - Order allowing revision petition and remanded matter for Executing Court for fresh consideration, cannot be considered as adverse order - No error apparent on the face of record - Review petition not maintainable and remedy is by way of appeal only...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 47, Rule 1 -- Review - It must be confined to error apparent on the face of record and review proceeding is not by way of an appeal - Re-appraisal of entire materials on record for finding error would amount to exercise of appellate jurisdiction which is not permissible...........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 437(5), 439(2) -- Cancellation of bail - Power of cancellation of bail has to be exercised with care and caution as it is power of extraordinary nature, as Courts have been empowered to cancel bail granted by it despite statutory bar u/s 362 Cr.P.C to alter or review its decision...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Ex-parte decree - Aggrieved has four options : (a) to file an application U.O.9.R.13 CPC for setting aside ex-parte decree; (b) to challenge decree on merits by filing an appeal; (c) to file a separate suit on the ground that previous decree was the result of fraud (d) to file an application for review...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 47, Rule 1 -- Review - When it is apparent that without further investigation or inquiry only one conclusion can be drawn in favour of petitioner then only review will lie...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 47, Rule 1 -- Review - Petitioner preferred application for recall of judgment being aggrieved by judgment - S.151 CPC therefore, cannot be called for, neither it is appropriate to treat this application U.O.47.R.1 CPC - If decision is considered to be erroneous, remedy is only to question judgment in appeal...........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439(2) -- Cancellation of bail - Misleading Court by concealing material facts - Court which granted bail, cannot reject bail already granted, as Court is not in a position to review its earlier order - Only remedy available is to file an appeal against order granting bail - Application for cancellation of bail rejected...........
