Punjab Land Revenue Rules -- Dismissal of Lambardar - Lambardar wrongly verified `Kursinama' (Pedigree-Table) in which name of widow of deceased omitted - Lambardar submitted that concerned Halqa Patwari fraudulently obtained his signatures on the mutation-sheet, on the day when mutations pertaining to the village were decided in the Tehsil office - Lapse on the part of..........
Punjab Land Revenue Rules -- Dismissal of Lambardar - Eventualities under Rule 16 put under two broad categories - Collector should record as to under which clause of Rule 16(i) or Rule 16(ii) , he was passing his order - In the absence of that - Collector's order is vague and non-speaking - Show-cause notice mentioned Rule 16 - Order of dismissal of Lambardar made no..........
Jurisdiction -- No Revenue Officer competent to sit in judgment over order passed by High Court - Revenue Officer not competent to give his own interpretation of law by disagreeing with judgment of High Court - Cannot give his own colourful and convenient construction of facts and provisions of law and thereafter pass order with altogether different import to such order..........
Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 34,35,36,37 -- Mutation of inheritance on the basis of Registered Will - Incorporated in latest Jamabandi - Civil Court set aside Registered Will - Appeal pending and judgment of lower Court stayed - Correct procedure to safeguard interest - Entry should be made by Halqa Patwari in Rapat Roznamcha relating to decree and stay along with..........
Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 34,35,36,37 -- Mutation - Does not ipso facto confer any right or title on the party in whose favour mutation is sanctioned - Mutation is a means of up-dating the revenue record...........
Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 16,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121 -- Challenge to partition on the ground that interest of minor co-sharer not safeguarded either by Court Guardian or by his brothers or his counsel - No instance quoted to show how minor's interest adversely affected - Objections against Naksha Bey neither raised before Commissioner nor before..........
Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121 -- Partition challenged as interest of minor-co-sharer not safeguarded - Brothers of minor have a common interest in remaining in possession of land in excess of their entitlement - Adopting devious tactics to thwart partition proceedings from time to time - Managed to delay partition proceedings..........
Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 34,35,36,37 -- Mutation of inheritance on the basis of Registered Will - Normally Revenue Officer has to rely on Registered Will - Cannot do so without hearing objections of the parties - Registered Will produced after 14 years of death of testator (Will executed in 1967, death of testator in 1975 and Will produced before Patwari in 1989) -..........
Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service Rules -- Tehsildar - Recruitment - G.O.Ms.No.145 (Revenue) dated 29.1.1990 issued by State of Tamil Nadu - Government decided to increase number of posts from 10 to 16 for city list for deputation as Tehsildars in Tamil Nadu Revenue Subordinate Service - Order challenged - Tribunal set aside G.O.Ms.No.145 - Appellants were directed to..........
Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 116,121 -- Partition of land through intervention of Revenue Officer - Unless and until it culminates in drawing up of `Instrument of Partition' and its subsequent incorporation in revenue record - Inconsequential and insignificant - A paper partition - Alleged partition of 1951 - Meaningless in 1988 because same not given effect to in..........
