Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Acquittal - Validity of - Notice has been issued by appellants-complainants - Cheques have been presented before Bank which were dishonoured - Notice has been issued in accordance with the provisions of law and has been received by respondent - Neither reply was sent by respondent-accused nor he paid..........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Wrong cheque number mentioned in demand notice and complaint - Mistake in one figure only - During the period of transaction only one cheque issued by the accused in the name of complainant which was dishonoured - Accused did not reply the demand notice on the ground that wrong cheque number was..........
Banking Service -- Cheque - Two cheques lost during transit - Proved on record that earlier also these two cheques were presented and dishonoured - Therefore loss of the cheques by the appellant has not caused any financial loss to the respondent - Moreover principal debtor was the person who had issued the cheque - He played fraud with the respondent by issuing a cheque..........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Cheques issued by accused in lieu of supply of glass bottles by complainant - Cheque when presented for encashment dishonoured with endorsement `stop payment' - Before filing complaint for dishonour of cheque, complainant complied all the mandatory procedure - No reply was given by accused to the..........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Registered office of complainant at Mumbai, purchase order placed at Mumbai, statutory notice issued from Mumbai and accused was called upon to pay the amount at Mumbai, cheque was deposited at Mumbai and it was dishonoured at Mumbai - Held, Court at Mumbai has jurisdiction...........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Petitioner No.1 who was working with complainant company allegedly misappropriated huge amount to the tune of Rs.17.00 lacs - Both petitioner No.1 as well as his wife petitioner No.2 assured to repay the said amount and issued cheques in discharge of this liability - Cheques issued by petitioner..........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Cheque was issued at `B' and the same was presented and dishonoured at `B' - Complainant residing at `P' and notice also issued from `P' - Held, court at `P' had territorial jurisdiction to try complaint...........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378(4) -- Dishonour of cheque - Existing liability - Appeal against acquittal - Dishonoured cheque had been issued before settlement of accounts as blank cheque as security when loan was advanced by complainant/financier to accused - Lower appellate court took notice of the fact that..........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Partnership firm - Two partners - One partner signed the cheque on behalf of the firm and the cheque was issued in his own name - Cheque dishonoured - Complaint against other partner - Held, complainant is co-drawer meaning thereby that he is the co-drawer as..........
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 147, 149, Insurance Act, 1938, Section 64VB -- Motor Insurance - Insurance of cover note - Premium paid by cheque - Cheque, however, dishonoured and company cancelled the cover note - Accident occurred two days prior to cancellation of cover note - Insurance company not liable - Held, mere issuance of cover note without payment of premium..........
