LawMirror.com

Results of deficiency+in+service

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 181-190 of 1940 Results

NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(e), 2(1)(o) -- Education - Coaching institute - Deficiency in service - Fee refund - Consumer - Consumer dispute - Plea that the case do not fall within the ambit of the CP Act, 1986 - Complaints were made on specific grounds of deficiency in service before the District Forum - As per Section 2(d)(ii) of the Act, 1986,..........

NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), 2(1)(e), 2(1)(o) -- Education - Coaching institute - Deficiency in service - Fee refund- Held that the coaching institutions may not be conventional educational institutions but since they provide coaching and training to students of an educational nature to equip them for higher studies in specialized educational..........

NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15, 27 -- Education - Coaching institute - Deficiency in service - Fee refund - Appeal - Frivolous litigation - Punitive damages - Adverse comments - Sweeping adverse comments made against all coaching institutes by the State Commission without any credible evidence to back these allegations and imposing damages of Rs. 25,000/- for..........

NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Insurance claim - Surveyor-'s report - The insured vehicle of the petitioner was buried under snow for several months - Because of the washing away of the road and inclement weather where the tanker was stranded, it took several months before the Surveyor could get the vehicle inspected - This delay could..........

NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 21(b) -- Revision - Concurrent findings - Housing - Non transfer of property - Frivolous petition - Punitive costs - In grounds challenging the impugned order, petitioner themselves have admitted that there is some delay in providing the civil amenities - Possession already given to the respondents as per sale deed which was..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12, 13 -- Courier - Delivery at wrong address - Plea of courier that consignment was delivered at wrong address as correct and accurate particulars of consignee were not given on the consignment resulting in wrong delivery - Contention repelled - Courier could ascertain correct particulars for consignee - It is deficiency of service...........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Insurance claim - Subrogation - From the pleading as well as the documents brought on record, the complainant have not been able to establish that there was any willful or deliberate negligence on the part of the OP in carrying out the operation, which ultimately led to the buckling of the crane boom and..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Medical advice - Rendering wrong professional advice - OPs advised surgery for acute appendicitis whereas on consultation of another doctor it was found there was small cyst in the left ovary - Both Fora below have returned their concurrent finding..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Medical advice - Rendering wrong professional advice - OPs advised surgery for acute appendicitis whereas on consultation of another doctor it was found there was small cyst in the left ovary - Both Fora below have returned their concurrent finding..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Tractor - Purchase of - Deficiency in service - Unfair trade practice - Three items for which payment made by the respondent-complainant allegedly not supplied - Since items provided have been clearly listed out and in acknowledgement the Respondent's signature are also there - Unable to accept the..........

Showing : 181-190 of 1940 Results