LawMirror.com

Results of need not to file application

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 181-190 of 1014 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 92 -- Leave to file suit u/s 92 CPC - Order passed on an application u/s 92 CPC is not required to be a speaking order though it should disclose application of mind...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 145, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Application of accused for striking off evidence has been dismissed - Quashing of order - If complainant is not allowed to file detailed affidavit, then the purpose and purport of provisions contained in NI Act would be rendered to be a nullity and the..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 14(3) -- Late production of documents - Plaintiff had not produced relevant documents at time when case was fixed for plaintiff's evidence, though time was granted to plaintiff to file such documents - Case was again listed for cross-examination of PWs, however, neither documents were produced nor any explanation was given for..........

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 79, Order 7, Rule 11 -- Rejection of plaint - Non-compliance of S.79 CPC - Defendant ought to have been named as Union of India in suit - These errors or mistakes committed in drafting of plaint could have very well be remedied by trial Court in exercise of powers U.O.1.R.10 CPC or U.O.6.R.17 CPC - Order rejecting plaint held, not proper..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 1 -- Permission to file an appeal as an indigent person - Petitioner is a senior citizen and in possession of only one room in the family house - Thus, a liberal approach has to be taken keeping in view the provisions of O.33.R.1 CPC - Merely because a report has come that house was newly constructed, it would not imply that..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Compromise - Eight cheques issued - Case closed - All eight cheques dishonoured - The only option available to the complainant is to file execution case before the same Judge for execution of the order in terms of compromise for recovery of amount mentioned in the cheques - Court ought to register a..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Proviso - Amendment of plaint - At the belated stage - Proposed amendment is not found to be necessary for the purpose of determining real question of controversy between parties - On the death of defendants when their LRs were brought on file, plaintiff could have asked for amendment at that stage but it was not done - Now,..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1(3) -- Withdrawal of suit with liberty to file fresh suit on same cause of action - Court cannot partly allow application for withdrawal of suit and rejecting prayer for liberty to file fresh suit on same cause of action - Trial Court has two options i.e either allow application and accord liberty in favour of plaintiff or to..........

TELANGANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 23, Rule 1, 3 -- Withdrawal of suit - Partition suit - Plaintiff wanted to withdraw the suit on the ground that some more parties and some more properties are to be added - However, plaintiff has liberty to file a petition U.O.1.R.10 CPC seeking amendment of plaint - Instead of availing such remedy, plaintiff seeks to totally..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 39 -- Transfer of execution proceedings - Executing Court suo moto transferred the execution proceedings from one State to another State - However, neither JD has any right to file such an application nor executing Court is vested with any such power to transfer proceedings on its own motion to another State in view of S.39 CPC - Such..........

Showing : 181-190 of 1014 Results