LawMirror.com

Results of +order+9+rule+4+of+civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1981-1990 of 11027 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 437, 439 -- Two bail applications - Common order can be passed by Sessions Court in two bail applications filed by petitioner in two separate crimes...........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Plea that trial Court should have passed an order of status quo instead of passing an order of temporary injunction - Trial Court while deciding application for temporary injunction is required to give a finding as to which party is in possession of the property in dispute - By directing parties to..........

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1, 4, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Section 20 -- Lok Adalat - Withdrawal of suit - Lok Adalat has no authority to exercise power U.O.23.R.1 CPC - Order passed by Lok Adalat in allowing withdrawal of suit is nullity and is no order in the eyes of law - By allowing withdrawal of suit by Lok Adalat, it cannot be said that..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 10 -- Stay of subsequent suit - First suit filed for declaration before civil Court and subsequent suit for eviction filed under provisions of Maharashtra Rent Control Act - Jurisdiction of Courts dealing with both the suits is completely distinct and different - Reliefs prayed for in subsequent suit also stands on a different footing..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22(c), 28, 29 -- Anticipatory bail - Contraband - Quantity recovered from possession of accused is commercial quantity - However, Court below while granting bail to accused does not refer to S.37 of NDPS Act and did not record satisfaction with regard to conditions..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 99, 101 -- Order U.O.21.R.99 CPC is final order not an interlocutory order, as question of right, title or interest in property is considered by virtue of O.21.R.101 CPC - Appeal and not petition u/art 227 of Constitution is maintainable...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 1, 3 -- Closure of evidence of defendant no.4 - Witness of defendant no.4 was present for cross-examination on two occasions - But on both the occasions witness of defendant no.4 not cross-examined by Counsel for plaintiff - Witness of defendant no.4 did not appear on one date on which his evidence was closed by Court - Evidence..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 4A -- (as in U.P) - Consolidation of suits - Interconnecting interests in relation to three subject matter of suits in question - For an effective and expeditious disposal of suit and in order to avoid a contradiction in finding to be recorded by Court below, with regard to interest of parties to suit, same deserves to be consolidated and..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9 -- Re-issue of warrant to Commissioner - Measurement of property on basis of sale deeds of parties - Suit for declaration and recovery of possession - It is for plaintiff to prove his title in order to succeed in suit - If defendant had purchased a portion of property prior to plaintiff's purchase, he would be automatically..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151 -- Witness not present for cross examination - Court passed an order to eschew the chief evidence affidavit - Witness is an old man, aged about 69 years who was suffering from fever and jaundice - Medical certificate were produced in support of said fact - However, trial Court has not referred to any medical certificate produced by..........

Showing : 1981-1990 of 11027 Results