LawMirror.com

Results of agricultural land injunction

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 11-20 of 33 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Restraining defendant from raising construction - Co-sharer - Suit land is un-partitioned as on date - If a co-sharer is in physical possession of a part of joint land and possession is admitted by other co-sharer, he cannot be restrained from raising construction thereupon - Said construction shall..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Permanent injunction - Agricultural land - Suit seeking injunction in respect of an agricultural land instituted without plaintiffs being recorded in revenue records - Plaintiffs having utterly failed to prove by pleading or by adducing evidence that they are owners in possession of suit property - Suit rightly dismissed...........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Permanent injunction - Agricultural land - Name of plaintiffs not recorded in revenue records - Question of declaration is also involved, which a civil Court cannot grant to plaintiffs as decree of declaration only can be passed by competent Court having revenue jurisdiction - Suit rightly dismissed...........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 102 -- Permanent injunction - Burden of proof - Agricultural land - Plaintiff filed suit on basis of ownership and title in suit property - However, plaintiffs upon whom burden of proof lies in view of S.101 of Evidence Act failed to produce any document pertaining to title in suit property - Entire..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Application for temporary injunction allowed - Suit for possession - Petitioner seeking exclusive possession on the basis of oral partition - There is no entry in revenue record with regard to oral partition - Moreover, land in dispute is stated to be agricultural and therefore, the petitioners cannot raise any..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 26 -- Stay of execution - Decree for possession and permanent prohibitory injunction - Defendant filed application for stay of execution on the ground that suit land was not identifiable and decree is unexecutable - However, land is clearly described and depicted in decree, there is thus, no ambiguity with regard to description of..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 9 -- Jurisdiction of civil Court - Agricultural land - Suit for permanent injunction, possession and damages - Civil Court have the power to entertain suit where main relief sought is that of injunction and demolition, a relief which could be granted by civil Court only - Relief of possession will be merely ancillary relief which civil..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Injunction - Co-sharer - Agricultural land - Defendant intended to construct - Proposed construction would change nature of agricultural land to gair mumkin land - Even if same ultimately comes to share of plaintiff after partition by that time, land would have been converted into gair mumkin and same cannot be restored as..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Agricultural land - Plaintiff claims to be owner of suit property on the basis of oral partition which took place between ancestors of parties - Defendants admitted said oral partition in family and its implementation - However, defendants failed to prove their ownership over suit..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973, Section 7, 10, 11 -- Appellant/plaintiff simply abused process of law in filing suit for permanent injunction in relation to suit land against respondents - Suit was misconceived and deserved dismissal on facts and in law on the grounds which are indeed apparent on the face of record and discussed in..........

Showing : 11-20 of 33 Results