LawMirror.com

Results of co sharers

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 11-20 of 476 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Co-sharers -- Co-sharer in possession is entitled to sell his or her share and deliver possession...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Permanent injunction - Co-sharers - In the absence of evidence that plaintiff is in exclusive possession of the property and there had been a partition, suit for permanent injunction against co-sharer is not maintainable - The only remedy for plaintiff would be to seek partition of suit land...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10 -- Impleadment of co-sharers - Eviction petition - Impleadment of other co-sharers of property - Co-sharers are not necessary parties in a suit for eviction filed by one co-sharer/landlord - Moreover, it is not the case of tenants that they are not tenants in the property and that they were not paying the rent to landlord -..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 8 -- Property of Hindu male dying intestate - Deceased had died after coming into force of the Act - Legal heirs of deceased were co-sharers thus, had equal share in disputed land - One of co-sharers `K' had no power to execute Will of entire land except of his share and on account of Will, mutation entered in the name of `K' was void ab..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Injunction - Co-sharers - No suit for injunction would be maintainable against co-sharers and the only remedy would be to seek partition...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 447, 457, 341 -- Offence u/ss 447, 457, 341 IPC - Quashing of proceedings - Entire case is based upon allegation that petitioners have trespassed into his share of house in question - Co-sharers in a disputed property cannot be said to have committed theft or criminal trespass - Petitioners cannot be held liable for any of offences..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 9 -- Non-joinder of necessary parties - Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Suit has been filed for benefit of all co-sharers, including two daughters of plaintiff as pleaded in plaint, plea of non-joinder of necessary parties, namely two daughters is not sustainable...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Restraining defendants from interfering in possession of plaintiff - Revenue authorities have already partitioned suit land - Possession of specific portion of suit land was handed over to plaintiff - Defendant thus, cannot interfere in possession of plaintiff, as partition proceedings stands..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Permanent injunction - Co-sharers - Plaintiff failed to establish his exclusive ownership and exclusive possession over suit land - No revenue documents have been placed on the record in evidence to show that plaintiff and defendant are in possession of a certain specific portions of suit land - In the absence of any evidence having..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7 -- Ad valorem Court fee - Suit for declaration that sale deed is illegal, null and void - Petitioner though sought suit for declaration but in fact he is seeking cancellation of sale deed to which petitioner is a party along with other co-sharers - Petitioner is thus, required to pay ad valorem Court fee on the consideration stated in the..........

Showing : 11-20 of 476 Results