LawMirror.com

Results of court fees and suits valuation act

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 11-20 of 23 Results

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 7(vi), Suits Valuation Act, 1887, Section 3 -- Court fee - Suit seeking relief of pre-emption - Plaintiffs are required to value the relief at 20 times the land revenue - Order directing payment of ad valorem Court fee in respect of reliefs claimed in suit is not proper...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1960, Section 37(2) -- Suit for partition - Court fees - Specific averment in plaint was that plaintiff was in joint possession of suit property with other co-shares - Ouster or exclusion from possession not shown - Plaintiff not liable to pay ad valorem court fee under S.37(1) - Payment of fix Court fees under S.37(2), proper...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Tamil Naidu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, Section 4, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 149, Order 7, Rule 11 -- Rejection of appeals - Deficit court fee was not paid in time i.e. within period of limitation - Held, need to hear opposite party becomes a necessity as per law - Therefore, objection made by opposite party that appeals were defective at the time..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 6, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 115, Rajasthan Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1961, Article 11(p) -- Sch.II, - Court fee - Revision petition - Held, court fee on a revision petition filed u/s 115 of C.P.C. against an order or decree of trial court passed in a suit filed u/s 6 of the Specific Relief Act shall be payable as per..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Tamil Naidu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, Section 37(2) -- Partition suit - Valuation thereof - Plaintiff has admitted that suit property is in possession of defendant - However, claims that possession of plaintiff shall be deemed to be possession of defendant also as they are co-owners - Held, plaintiff being a co-owner is entitled to value relief for..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 89, Order 23, Rule 3, Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 16, Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959, Section 69 - - Refund of court fee - Whether plaintiff who paid full court fee is entitled to get refund of entire amount of court fee on settlement of disputes between parties and on filing compromise petition u/R.3 of O.23 CPC and..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, Section 6 -- Relief of two declarations - Valuation of - Held, u/s 6 of the Act, the relief for two declarations should be valued separately with a fee of aggregate of the valuation...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 114, Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959, Section 68 -- Sch. II Art. (g) and (t) - Review - Application for - Error apparent - Found - Review allowed - Applicant is entitled for refund of Court-fees paid on memorandum of review application...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100, Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959, Section 52 -- Expl. (3) - Second appeal - Valuation for purpose of Court fees - Decree passed by the Lower Court with interest till realisation - Confirmed in appeal - Valuation of second appeal - Interest upto date of filing appeal to also to be included for payment of court fee...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

A P Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 -- Court fee - Court after holding an enquiry is to fix the value of the property - Suit when held not properly valued without holding following the procedure and without stating what the market value of property was on date of suit, is erroneous...........

Showing : 11-20 of 23 Results