LawMirror.com

Results of court marked documents

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 11-20 of 27 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 91, 92 -- Document admitted and marked during examination-in-chief of plaintiff - Plaintiff died subsequently and was not available for cross-examination - Said admitted documents can very well be taken into account and relied upon in the absence of plaintiff's evidence - However, other documents which were not admitted by defendants cannot be..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Punjab Civil and Criminal Courts, Preparation and Supply of Copies of Records Rules, 1965, Rule 3 -- Supply of certified and uncertified copies of documents by Juvenile Justice Board - Petitioner facing trial in Court of Sessions and co-accused, a juvenile, facing trial in Juvenile Justice Board - Offence pertaining to same FIR -..........

HYDERABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 14(3) -- Late production of documents - Photocopy of document/receipt, which is the basis of suit - Original receipt was misplaced - Plaintiff seeks permission to place on record photocopy of said receipt, which in fact is mentioned in the list of documents - No prejudice is caused to defendant, as Court below had only allowed the..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 14, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 1, 2, 3, 7 -- Production and marking of documents - Law as to - (1) A list of documents should be filed along with the plaint or written statement and if the parties want to file document subsequently, they have to take leave of the Court; (2) The documents, which are marked, does not..........

HYDERABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 65 -- Secondary evidence - Photostat copies of documents marked exhibit without obtaining prior permission of Court and without any objection - At the time of marking documents as exhibit, Court applied its mind, which amounts to implied permission to adduce secondary evidence...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2014
Details

Return of documents -- Normally whoever has got the document marked can solicit for return of such a document after the case is decided or when it is not needed for further reference by that very Court or any other Court of Appeal or Revision - But if a third party is applying for return of a document he must establish his right to receive the same in accordance with law..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 115 -- Exhibit of document - Objection - Respondent No.1/plaintiff examined as PW2 placed on record Ex.P2 and Ex.P3 i.e. attested copies of neonda bahis - Petitioner/defendant filed application that exhibited documents which were not per se admissible may be marked - Dismissal of application - Challenge to - Held, petitioner could not..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11 -- Res judicata - Applicability of - There is no discussion or finding with regard to title of parties to schedule property, which is subject matter in present suits, either substantially or incidentally - Held, it cannot be said that since Court in earlier suit had considered all documents marked on behalf of plaintiffs in present..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 27 -- Additional evidence - Appeal - Once application is allowed for adding additional evidence, due opportunity should be given to petitioner concerned to get documents marked in the way known to law - But if it is a public document and beyond controversy, straightaway, appellate Court can give marking and decide appeal...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 61, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 12, Rule 2, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 4 -- Contents of documents - Should be proved either by primary or by secondary evidence - Admission of a document - Amounts to admission of contents but not its truth - Documents having not been produced and marked as required under the Evidence Act..........

Showing : 11-20 of 27 Results