Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 201 -- Double murder case - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen theory - Time gap between incident of last seen and time of death is 19-20 hours - Suspicion arises with regard to presence of accused with two deceased or testimony of PW4 about his having lastly seen deceased with accused - Last seen evidence not proved - Accused..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 201 -- Double murder case - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of spade and bullock - Recovery effected after 3-1/2 months and there is no independent witness to such recovery - Spade otherwise not sent to forensic examination - Specific circumstance with regard to recovery has not been put to accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C - Recovery not..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 323, 324, 341, 364, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 506 -- Bail - Murder - Eye witness when tried to prevent assaulting victim, he was also taken in car and in his presence only inflicted the injuries and committed the murder - In such circumstances, individual role of each of accused cannot be..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 323, 324, 341, 364, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 506 -- Successive bail application - On parity basis - Murder - Accused is relative of co-accused nos.1 to 3 and while committing murder, all of them joined together and went in a vehicle and when CW19 tried to prevent act of accused he was..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 365, 380, 395, 34 -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen theory - There is gap of five days from the date on which deceased was taken away by accused and dead body was recovered - However, prosecution failed to prove that dead body was recovered at the instance of A-3 - Last seen evidence not proved...........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 365, 380, 395, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27 -- Murder - Disclosure statement - Recovery of dead body of deceased - No confessional statement of A-3 was recorded u/s 27 of the Act with regard to recovery of dead body - Prosecution thus, failed to prove the circumstance that dead body of deceased was recovered at the instance..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 365, 380, 395, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27 -- Murder - Disclosure statement - Recovery of spade at the instance of A-1 - Recovery effected from a place which was already known and not exclusively within knowledge of A-1 - Recovery is not reliable - Accused acquitted...........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 346, 364, 201, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25 -- Second bail application - Murder - Accused is in long judicial custody - Out of 36 PWs, only 3 witnesses have been examined so far - Conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time - Bail application allowed...........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 396, 364, 147, 149, 120B -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Failure of accused in a case based on circumstantial evidence which included last seen together theory to explain u/s 313 Cr.P.C as to under what circumstances victim suffered death, would not be a ground to arrive at an irresistible conclusion that accused were involved in..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 396, 364, 147, 149, 120B -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - In a case based on circumstantial evidence if entire chain is duly proved by cogent evidence, conviction could be recorded even if corpus is not found - But when dead body of deceased was discovered from place shown by accused, it is imperative on part of prosecution to..........
