Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 324, 452, 506, 34 -- Offence u/ss 323, 324, 452, 506, 34 IPC - Property dispute between parties - Possibility of injuries being self inflicted not denied by doctor - Accused was not present at the place of incident at the relevant time as per their mobile location - Material variation between statements of complainant and CW2 -..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 324, 34 -- Offence u/ss 323, 324, 34 IPC - Contradictions and discrepancies in the evidence of injured and eye witnesses - None of independent witnesses have supported the case of prosecution - PWs and accused are not in good terms - Accused acquitted...........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 324, 449, 34 -- Murder - Testimony of child witness - PW1/child witness was hiding in his house at the time of incident and he disclosed the incident to milkman after the accused fled - Said milkman was not examined - There is no support or corroboration to testimony of PW1 - Possibility of PW1 being tutored cannot be ruled out - It is..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 324, 449, 34 -- Murder - Non-examination of material witnesses - PW1/child witness was hiding in his house at the time of incident and after the incident he disclosed the same to milkman - Prosecution has not explained why milkman was not examined as a witness - He was very important witness who was first person to whom PW1 disclosed..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 324, 449, 34 -- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Prosecution stated that there were foot marks of shoes/footwear of accused near the house where incident took place - Prosecution took the moulds of foot marks as deposed by PW6 - Footwear/shoes of both the accused were taken into custody in the presence of PW6 - But the shoes of..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 341, 323, 324, 325, 394, 201, 34 -- Cancellation of bail - Offence u/ss 341, 323, 324, 325, 201, 34 IPC - Subsequent FIR registered against accused after grant of bail - Second crime cannot be treated as overwhelming enough to impede fair trial in first crime for cancelling bail already granted..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34, 324 -- Murder - Accused had come prepared with lathi along with others who had carried toka, axe, gandasi - This fact is corroborated by fact that blood smeared lathi was recovered from possession of accused - Evidence establishes participation of accused in commission of offence with co-accused - Accused was the first one who..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 324, 326, 34 -- Murder - Testimony of sole eye witness/PW6 - Inconsistencies and contradictions were found in evidence of PW6 - PW6 claimed to have sustained injuries on account of assault committed upon him - He was examined on next day, however, PW11 opined that age of injury was within one hour - Injuries which could be self..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 147, 148, 149, 324, 427, 441, 323, 506, 447, 307, 302, 34 -- Bail - Murder - Prior enmity between parties - Accused were known to complainant, thus, it cannot be concluded at this stage that it was not possible to identify accused - Accused were specifically named in FIR - Nature of allegations..........
Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, Section 4, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 324, 34 -- Benefit of probation - Offence u/ss 324, 34 IPC - Accused are first offenders and aged persons - Appeal against conviction is of the year 1984 - Benefit of probation thus, given to accused...........
