Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39, Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 17(2), 19 -- Suit for mandatory injunction against daughter-in-law - Daughter-in-law obtained residence order u/s 19 of PWDV Act - Occupation or residence of daughter-in-law could only be a permissive occupation which does not amount to legal possession, as she is residing..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39, Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 17(2), 19 -- Suit for mandatory injunction against daughter-in-law under PWDV Act is maintainable to evict her under PWDV Act, as it is a procedure established by law referred u/s 17(2) of PWDV Act to evict or exclude the aggrieved person, even if she obtains a residence..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for perpetual and mandatory injunction - Framing of suit was not an issue before trial Court and first appellate Court - Non-suiting plaintiff by High Court on that ground is unsustainable - High Court ought to have accepted plaintiff's case by appreciating documents..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39 -- Mandatory injunction - Demolition of three public utility constructions - Disputed constructions have been raised on the main road which is 5 feet below the road adjacent to plaintiff's house - Right of frontage if any available to plaintiff is clearly not obstructed by any of disputed constructions - Plaintiff not entitled to any..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 65 -- Suit for possession by way of mandatory injunction - Suit must be filed within 12 years from the date of dispossession - In the absence of any specific date and time of dispossession and when plaintiff himself acknowledged in his cross-examination that defendants are in possession of suit property..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39 -- Mandatory injunction - Directing defendants to hand over the possession of land - Defendants utilized the land for construction of road way back in the year 1980 - Witnesses of defendants admitted that no consent was procured from plaintiffs before construction of road in their presence - Defendant/State is bound to pay the..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39 -- Suit for mandatory injunction against State - Limitation - Since State cannot take plea of adverse possession therefore, plea of limitation cannot be taken by State - Suit not barred by limitation...........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39, Easements Act, 1882, Section 52 -- Licence - Defendants have been in possession of suit land exclusively and have been using it admittedly for the last 22-23 years - There is no iota of evidence on record that any amount was being paid as licence fee, nor was it recorded in the revenue document that defendants were in possession as a..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39 -- Permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction - Land in question is joint - Since, defendants are trying to occupy the portion of joint land and exclude plaintiffs from its use, they are entitled to seek relief of prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction - They need not seek relief of partition or declaration of title...........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39 -- Permanent and mandatory injunction - Plaintiff failed to produce a single document of title in respect of suit land - Revenue documents led in evidence are essentially fiscal in nature - Moreover, revenue authorities or revenue Courts cannot decide complicated cases involving disputes regarding title for which jurisdiction only..........
