LawMirror.com

Results of status quo

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 11-20 of 285 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 -- Writ jurisdiction - Violation of status quo order - Allegation pertaining to violation of order of status quo require determination of fact which cannot be done in summary proceedings u/art 226 of Constitution - Petitioner is relegated to ordinary civil remedy of application U.O.39.R.2-A CPC...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Partition suit - Plaintiff and defendants both are having equal right over property in dispute unless it is divided as a consequence of partition suit - Therefore, to protect the property there is prima facie case and balance of convenience in favour of plaintiff as well as defendants also - Though..........

JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Status quo order - Parties directed to maintain status quo on spot viz. possession - Such order does not put any fetters upon parties to raise construction on the suit property - There is no need for any party to seek permission of Court for raising construction over portion of suit property which was in their possession -..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Suit for specific performance, cancellation of sale deed executed by owner in favour of Respondent No.2 and suit for permanent injunction - Plaintiff ready and willing to make the balance payment and getting sale deed executed in his favour - Prima facie case is in favour of plaintiff - Plaintiff..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Status quo - Plaintiff, having agreement to sell in her favour does deserve the protection of her rights qua the property in question - If no interim order is passed in her favour and the property is further transferred or alienated, no adequate relief would be granted to her if the suit is ultimately decreed in her favour..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Status quo order - Parties directed to maintain status quo order regarding possession and record of site in question and further not to transfer, mortgage or alienate suit property - Meaning thereby, as there is an order of status quo, party whosoever was in possession of property on date of filing of suit shall remain in..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Status quo order - Once suit for permanent injunction was decreed, defendants had been restrained from interfering in the possession of plaintiffs, operation of judgment decree rightly not stayed - However, once first appeal was under consideration of Court, proper way to deal with the matter was to pass an order directing..........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Agreement to sell -- Suit for specific performance on basis of unregistered agreement to sell - Order passed as to status quo in respect of title and possession till disposal of suit - Suit for specific performance of an unregistered agreement of sale is maintainable - No error committed by trial Court while granting injunction in favour of plaintiff...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Ad interim injunction - Once plaintiff is not owner of entire suit property mentioned in amended plaint, whether suit at his behest for said land is itself was maintainable or not would be a debatable question - Appeal is already pending against order rejecting ad interim injunction - Status quo order passed till appeal is..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Armed service -- Benefit of permanent commission - On parity basis - Appellant was wrongly excluded from consideration when other similarly situated officers were considered and granted permanent commission - There is no reason as to why appellant should not be treated alike - Appellant a woman officer has continuously worked since 2007 and even as late as on 2017 she was..........

Showing : 11-20 of 285 Results