LawMirror.com

Results of 138 acquittal

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 191-200 of 466 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Appeal against acquittal - Leave to appeal - Cheque issued towards repayment of loan which was given to accused about 7 years ago - Complainant failed to identify the accused - Admittedly, son of complainant and accused were having business dealings and it was possible that cheque in question had been..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 256, 378(4) -- Dishonour of cheque - Dismissal of complaint in default - Said dismissal amount to acquittal of accused, and therefore, appeal and not revision lies u/s 378(4) Cr.P.C...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Appeal against acquittal - Complaint u/s 138 of the Act - In the instant case, accused issued 3 cheques to purchase vehicle from complainant - Out of 3 cheques only 1 cheque was honourned by making cash payment and other 2 cheques were dishonoured - As per accused, he has made cash payment of other 2..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Friendly loan - Failure to prove advancement of loan - No receipt or document executed for advancement of loan - Cheque filled in with two different pens, indicating that it was misuse of blank cheque - No illegality or perversity in the impugned order of acquittal...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - No document to show any loan transaction - Complainant also not proved his capacity to give such a big loan - Even if complainant had collected the money from his grandmother and relatives, then why he has given such a huge amount to accused without obtaining any security document/receipt - Probable..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Appeal against acquittal - Enhancement of sentence - In the instant case, accused is not imprisoned but only sentenced to pay fine of Rs.2 lakhs and in default, to suffer S.I. for 3 months for dishonour of two cheques amounting Rs.1 lakh each - As per S.138 of the Act, it is permissible to pass sentence..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 6, 5 -- Dishonour of cheque - Document which complainant relies on as a cheque, in fact is a withdrawal slip and not cheque - Acquittal of accused by trial Court is possible view - No reason to interfere in order of acquittal - Application seeking leave against acquittal dismissed...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 139, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378(4) -- Dishonour of cheque - Presumption - Appeal against acquittal - Capacity to advance loan - Nothing on record regarding payment of Rs.10 Lakhs by complainant to accused - Even, accused has appeared as defence witness and stated that she had litigation with one `A' and after..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 256 -- Dishonour of cheque - Non-appearance of complainant - Discretion of Court - Order of acquittal cannot be mechanically passed on the absence of complainant - Magistrate is expected to exercise discretionary power conferred on him judicially and judiciously...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2016
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 256 -- Dishonour of cheque - Non-appearance of complainant - Order of acquittal of accused - Accused is served with summons but does not remain present before Court and a warrant is issued, but still not executed - It would therefore, not be just and proper to focus on absence of..........

Showing : 191-200 of 466 Results