LawMirror.com

Results of removal+of+encroachment

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 191-200 of 571 Results

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Section 14, Article 243, Rule 33B - - Removal of Pradhan - Object of notice contemplated under the provision of Section 14 read with Rule 33-B - Held, notice contemplated under the provision of Section 14 read with Rule 33-B of the Rules refers to the proposal or intention of the members of the Gram Sabha for the removal of the Pradhan and it..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, Section 20 -- Sarpanch - Removal - Validity - Respondent No.7 removed from post of Sarpanch and disqualified for contesting elections of Panchayat for next five years on ground that by digging earth she has caused financial loss to the tune of Rs.1,63,000/- to Panchayat - No evidence on record showing that after digging earth, it was sold..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, Section 20(1)(a), 208(1)(c) -- Panch - Removal - Possession of contraband - Whether petitioner can be removed from post of Panch u/s.20(1)(a) of the Act during pendency of criminal trial? - Held, if Sarpanch/Panch is found guilty and has been convicted for any offence involving moral turpitude or for such offence i.e., forgery in..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, Section 20(3) -- Suspension of Panch - Possession of contraband - Whether petitioner should be continued under suspension in view of S.20(3) of the Act even after removal order goes? - Held, having possession of any narcotic substance is a serious offence and amounts to moral turpitude - It is a fit case where removal order passed by..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 354, 315 -- Appeal against acquittal - Case of complainant is that at the time of occurrence she was pregnant and on account of severe injures her pregnancy was terminated - Report neither shows any miscarriage of pregnancy nor any damage to pregnancy zone - It even does not show that actually there was any pregnancy on the date of incident..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 378 -- Theft - Nature of 'possession' referred in S.378 of IPC - Held, S.378 of IPC defines 'theft' as dishonest removal of movable property out of possession of any person without consent of that person - Standing timber being embedded in earth is immovable property - Moment it is severed from earth it becomes capable of being object of..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Service -- Disciplinary proceedings - Bank employee - Charge of financial irregularities and of making fraudulent withdrawals deriving pecuniary gain - Charge proved - Order of removal - Reviewing Authority modified the order of punishment and reduced it from removal from service to demotion from the cadre of Junior Management Grade Scale-I to the cadre of clerk with a..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Medical negligence -- Principle of res ipsa loquitur - Hysterectomy operation - After removal of sutures blood oozed and abdomen burst - Held to be a fit case where the principle of res ipsa loquitur would be fully applicable - State Commission was right in holding the OP negligent in the matter - See no reason to interfere with the impugned order...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Medical negligence -- Principle of res ipsa loquitur - Hysterectomy operation - After removal of sutures blood oozed and abdomen burst - Held to be a fit case where the principle of res ipsa loquitur would be fully applicable - State Commission was right in holding the OP negligent in the matter - See no reason to interfere with the impugned order...........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Punjab National Bank Officer Employees (Discipline and Appeal) 1977 -- Regulation 7(2) Petitioner, an Assistant Manager in Bank, was removed from service after instituting an enquiry for misconduct during his service - Enquiry Officer had found petitioner guilty of two charges partially while exonerating petitioner of two other charges - Disciplinary authority differed..........

Showing : 191-200 of 571 Results