LawMirror.com

Results of 69(2)+partnership+act

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 201-210 of 248 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1993
Details

Partnership Act, 1932, Section 69, Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 20 -- An un-registered partnership firm cannot maintain petition u/s 20 of Arbitration Act and registration of firm subsequent to filing of petition cannot have the effect of validating petition...........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1993
Details

Partnership Act, 1932, Section 69, Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 8 -- Dissolution - Dispute between partners - Arbitration clause - Application u/s 8 of Arbitration At for appointing an arbitrator for settlement of the dispute - Application is hit by the bar of S.69 of Partnership Act...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1993
Details

Indian Partnership Act, 1932, Section 69 -- Partnership firm not registered on the date of suit - Suit is not maintainable - Subsequent registration does not cure the defect...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1993
Details

Partnership Act, 1932, Section 69 -- Defendants merely disputing lack of registration of firm in written statement - Trial Court as well as Appellate Court finding that firm was registered - In second appeal defendant contending that names of partners suing were not shown in the register of firms - In absence of pleading, the defendant cannot raise such objection...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1992
Details

Partnership Act, 1932, Section 69(1) & (3) -- Suit by a partner (s) of an unregistered firm against the firm or fellow partner (s) for accounts without a prayer for dissolution of the firm is not maintainable...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1992
Details

Partnership Act, 1932, Section 69(2) -- Current partners as on the date of the suit, should be shown as partners in the Registrar of firms - If not, the suit will be hit by S.69 (2)...........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1992
Details

Partnership Act, 1932, Section 69 -- Suit to recover the amount due to a dissolved firm is maintainable even If the firm has not been registered...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1992
Details

Partnership Act, 1932, Section 69(2) -- Suit filed on behalf of a partnership firm but name of partners not appearing in the register of firm - Suit is not maintainable...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1990
Details

Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 69(2)(a) -- Mortgage - Default in payment of interest - Power of sale - No notice is required if interest due is Rs.500/- and is unpaid for three months after becoming due...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Partnership act, 1932, Section 69(2) -- Suit filed by unregistered firm - During pendency of suit firm registered - Suit is not liable to be dismissed for want of registration on date of suit - Suit can be deemed to have been instituted on date of registration and can be continued - Limitation starts from the date of registration of the firm and not from the date of filing..........

Showing : 201-210 of 248 Results