LawMirror.com

Results of limitation act s 5 condonation of delay

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 211-220 of 769 Results

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay - Specific stand taken by defendant in her delay condonation application that in absence of any notice regarding transfer of suit, she had no knowledge about proceedings - Defendant further contended that when she learnt about ex parte..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 9, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Objections to attachment - Dismissal in default - Restoration - Condonation of delay - Delay of 3-1/2 years - Material on record that plaintiffs had knowledge about order dismissing objections in default - Application for restoration of objections rightly rejected...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Delay of 350 days in filing application to set aside ex parte decree - Condonation - Plea of non informing of passing of decree by counsel - If at all counsel has not informed about passing of ex parte decree, petitioner could have got information through..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Courts should adopt a liberal, pragmatic and a justice oriented approach in matters of condonation of delay - Courts should avoid a pedantic view and eschew servitude to procedure in such matters...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Ex parte divorce decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay - Notice sent by registered post and no notice was issued to be served personally - Action of Family Court in dispensing with personal service impliedly without passing any order justifying it, cannot be countenanced..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 19, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Restoration of appeal dismissed in default - Condonation of delay in filing application U.O.41.R.19 CPC - Restoration application though required to be filed within 30 days from date of dismissal of appeal, but same was filed with a delay of about 22 months - No cause much less sufficient..........

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Succession Act, 1925, Section 388(2) - - Delay of 74 days in filing appeal u/s 388(2) of Succession Act - Appeal delayed due to ill advice of counsel - Application for condonation of delay is supported by an affidavit which was not controverted by non-applicants - Delay of 74 days condoned - Application allowed...........

TELANGANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay - Delay of 547 days in filing petition to set aside ex parte decree - False ground set up to condone delay of 547 days in filing petition to set aside ex parte decree - There is no sufficient cause to condone delay as sought for -..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay of 119 days - Plea that summons were served but same mingled with other papers due to which defendant could not appear in the case - During pendency of execution proceedings, substantial amount paid - Delay condoned - Ex parte decree set..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2020
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Delay of 993 days in filing appeal - Parties were attempting settlement and three years lapsed - Settlement failed and thereafter appeal was filed - Such a reason furnished for condoning enormous delay of 993 days is neither candid not convincing...........

Showing : 211-220 of 769 Results