Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Discretion to condone the delay must be exercised with care and caution on having objective satisfaction regarding sufficient cause to condone the delay - In the instant case, there is no sufficient reason disclosed in the application u/s 5 of the Act to condone the delay - Application rejected...........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Appeal against acquittal - Condonation of delay - Delay in filing appeal against acquittal can be condoned in an application filed u/s 5 of Limitation Act...........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Appeal against acquittal - Condonation of delay - Delay in filing appeal against acquittal can be condoned in an application filed u/s 5 of Limitation Act...........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Delay of 480 days in filing revision - Reason for delay is inaction on the part of counsel who was representing the petitioner in Court below - It is not case of wrong advise - Argument advanced to substantiate the ground of delay has in fact no force - Application dismissed...........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Delay of 480 days in filing revision - There is no reason for condoning delay in preferring revision against interim order that too after delay of 480 days - Sufficient cause has not been even shown by petitioner for preferring the revision after a long delay - Application dismissed...........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - While ascertaining sufficient cause, day to day explanation of delay is not required but it has to ensure the bonafides of applicant who sought condonation of delay from the trial Court...........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - While ascertaining sufficient cause, day to day explanation of delay is not required but it has to ensure the bonafides of applicant who sought condonation of delay from the trial Court...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay - Application for setting aside ex parte decree was filed after a substantial delay and no document in support of application for condonation of delay was filed - Application is barred by law and thus, liable to be dismissed solely on the..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay - Application for setting aside ex parte decree was filed after a substantial delay and no document in support of application for condonation of delay was filed - Application is barred by law and thus, liable to be dismissed solely on the..........
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2003, Section 15, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1 -- Eviction petition - Non filing of written statement in time - Condonation of delay - Petitioner failed to place any document on record to show the hardship that was caused to him on account of which he did not file written statement in time - He was..........
