LawMirror.com

Results of prosecution+sanction

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 221-230 of 10434 Results

JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 254(3) -- Evidence for prosecution - Deferment of cross-examination - Deferment u/s 254(3) cannot be asserted as matter of right - Parties seeking deferral u/s 254(3) BNSS, must provide sufficing reasons to invoke discretion of Court to permit cross-examination of witness to be deferred until any other witness or witnesses,..........

JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 254(3) -- Evidence for prosecution - Deferment of cross-examination - Application for deferring cross examination of a witness or witnesses, on same set of facts, must be made before commencement of cross examination of a particular witness...........

JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 254(3) -- Evidence for prosecution - Deferment of cross-examination - Application u/s 254(3) BNSS must be filed, as early as possible, but, in any case, before the commencement of cross examination of a witness...........

JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 254(3) -- Evidence for prosecution - Deferment of cross-examination - Court u/s 254(3) BNSS, is vested with jurisdiction to permit deferment of cross examination not only of a witness but set of witnesses and it depends upon case to case justifying deferral of cross-examination...........

JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 254(3) -- Evidence for prosecution - Deferment of cross-examination - Court while dealing with application u/s 254(3) BNSS, must consider apprehension of improvisation by prosecution witnesses in their cross-examination to circumvent defence strategy - If appreciation is well founded, it can hamper the prospects of a fair..........

JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 254(3) -- Evidence for prosecution - Deferment of cross-examination - Plea for deferral u/s 254(3) BNSS must preferably be made before presentation of case calendar or at earliest available opportunity, before defence strategy become known to prosecution...........

JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 254(3) -- Evidence for prosecution - Deferment of cross-examination of 6 prosecution witness until they are examined in chief - Witnesses cited as eye-witnesses in challan, on same set of facts - Petitioners pleaded that cross-examination of these witnesses may disclose defence strategy and provide opportunity to..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 20(b)(ii)(C) -- Contraband - Appellant was not mentioned as accused in all the contemporary documents including memo of arrest - Accused is described as `S' - It is not put to appellant in her examination u/s 313 Cr.P.C that she is the same person as said `S' - Appellant was thus, deprived of an opportunity..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 409, 420, 120B, 34, 37 -- (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Ss.316(5), 318(4), 61(2), 3(5), 3(8)), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Ss.7, 7A, 8, 13(1)(b), 13(2), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.438 (Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.482) - Offence u/Ss.409, 420, 120-B, 34, 37 IPC and 7, 7A, 8, 13(1)(b), 13(2) PCA - Anticipatory..........

TRIPURA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 306 -- Abetment of suicide - Prosecution failed to establish a proximate link between alleged acts of cruelty and deceased's decision to commit suicide - No specific evidence was found that accused instigated, provoked or aided deceased to take the extreme step - Witnesses deposed that one month back there was a quarrel between accused and..........

Showing : 221-230 of 10434 Results