LawMirror.com

Results of cross+examination+of+prosecutrix

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 2351-2360 of 2614 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 7 -- Exparte order - Setting aside - Court has power to set aside exparte order and to impose costs and put the applicant on terms - Costs to be imposed should be reasonable so as to compensate the plaintiff for the loss of time and inconvenience - Court can direct the defendant to file written statement within an appointed time or..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302 -- Murder - Conviction - Eye witness real sister of deceased - No reason to discard her evidence found to be wholly reliable - Evidence of P.W.2 corroborated by medical evidence - P.W.1 seeing accused with gun - Deviation in cross examination that gun was lying there not material - No evidence that death occurred accidentally - Case..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 13, Rule 2 -- Documents - Late production - Application for late production of documents filed after 15 years of settlement of issues - Documents in power and possession and knowledge of applicant - Documents neither relied upon nor produced at appropriate stage - Production sought on pretext of clarification of points crept in during..........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, 399 -- Recall of witness for further cross examination - Witness cross examined comprehensively - Useless to recall witness for further cross examination - Application for recall not entertainable...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 137 -- Cross examination of defendant by co-defendant - Permissible only to the extent of clash of interest of the co-defendant - If at later stage Court finds that defendants were colluding, the same would be appreciated by the Court at the appropriate stage...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 307, 34 -- Delayed FIR - Occurrence took place at 5.30. P.M. - Statement given by PW9 to the police at 7.30 P.M. and FIR recorded at 10.30 P.M. - Special report reached Magistrate on the next day at 1.35 P.M. at a distance of 25km - Held that there is marked delay in lodging of the FIR as delayed special report put the Court at caution..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, 114 -- Defendant appeared as a witness - As his defence was struck off as such his statement discontinued and closed - Plaintiff had no opportunity to cross examine the defendant - Incomplete evidence cannot be treated as evidence and no adverse inference can be drawn due to absence of cross-examination...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 118 -- Power of attorney holder - There is no embargo for a power of attorney holder to appear as a witness - Power of attorney holder whether has personal knowledge about the controversy or not is a question which can be thrashed out by cross-examining him and only if it is found that power of attorney holder had no personal knowledge about the..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 145, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 161, 162 -- Cross examination of witness with previous statement - There is no prohibition imposed by S.145 for contradicting the witness from his previous statement recorded otherwise than during investigation under S.162 Cr.P.C...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 22 -- Appeal by one defendant - Another defendant can file cross objections...........

Showing : 2351-2360 of 2614 Results