LawMirror.com

Results of section+151+of+c+p+c

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 2431-2440 of 6199 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 9 -- Companies Act, 1956, Sections 9 and 10 - Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867, Section 8-C - Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 6 - Jurisdictional bar of civil court - Possession and dispossession from press - Rival claims of parties as to whether one party has illegally been dispossessed by the other or not - Such a suit apart..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 154 -- Rape - Non examination of First informant - FIR proved and exhibited through I.O. - FIR can only be read that in fact it was recorded at the date and time mentioned by the I.O. in his evidence - Contents of the F.I.R. cannot be used for any purpose to base the conviction save and except in..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d),(ii) -- Consumer - Applicant for house allotment - A person who has applied for allotment of a house is covered by definition of a `consumer' as contained in Section 2(1) (d) (ii) of the C.P. Act...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 357 -- Criminal - Dishonour of cheque - Compensation - There arises no question of ordering compensation in terms of Section 357(3) of the Code to the Government or State in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act...........

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(o),(d) -- Consumer - Housing construction - Complaint by flat purchasers that house builder not executing Deed of conveyance - Admitted by the builder that there is agreement executed between him and the complainants-flat purchasers and the rights of the parties governed by the provisions of Maharashtra Flat Ownership Act, 1963..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 -- Alternative remedy of appeal against impugned orders competent - Point with regard to availability of alternative remedy raised for the first time during the course of arguments and that too orally - Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appeal against impugned orders - Haryana Municipal Act, Section..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, Section 92A,110 -- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166(3) - Compensation claim - Limitation - Accident took place on 20.7.1983 - Claim filed before MACT on 11.10.1984 - Findings of the Tribunal that the claim petition filed beyond period of limitation held not maintainable - Appeal filed in 1985 taken up in 2003 after coming into force of 1988..........

RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 3,2(1),(d),(ii),14, Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, Section 13,15, Railways Act, 1989, Section 123,124,124A,125 -- Bar of jurisdiction - Railway service - Accidental death - Deceased waiting for train at platform while drinking water at hydrant foundation wall of hydrant fell on him causing his death due to grievous head injury -..........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 3, Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 7B -- Telephone bill - Deficiency in service - The provisions of Section 7(B) of the Telegraph Act do not in any way bar a subscriber from filing a complaint under the Act on account of deficiency in service on the part of appellant/OP...........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15 -- Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Mere interdepartmental consultation leading to delay in filing the appeal does not constitute `sufficient cause' for the condonation of delay in terms of the provision of Section 15 of the Act...........

Showing : 2431-2440 of 6199 Results