Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 41, Rule 27 -- Appeal - Additional Evidence - Rejection of application - As per petitioner, respondent No.1 has sold the premises in year 2005 and he is now no more owner of structure and has no locus-standi to file eviction petition - Petitioners have already placed on record copy of sale deed whereby respondent No.1 has sold..........
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Section 2(d), 14(2) -- Eviction petition - Landlord - Locus standi - According to petitioner, respondent No.1 has sold his share in building in question, therefore, he has no locus-standi to file petition - In reply to eviction petition, petitioners have not taken specific plea regarding locus-standi - It is not the case of..........
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13(3)(a)(i) -- Bonafide requirement - Respondent landlord registered school society required demised premises to set up library room, computer room, staff room etc. - Tenant contended that the Society had sold some shops after these were got vacated - Held, merely because some shops were sold by the Society to..........
Haryana Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1972 -- Land in dispute individual ownership of Gram Panchayat - Held, Gram Panchayat is competent to invoke the provisions of Public Premises Act...........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(iii) -- Eviction of tenant sought on the ground that tenanted premises had become unfit and unsafe for human habitation - Report of building expert indicated the age of building as 100 years and thus having become unfit and unsafe for human habitation - Tenant raised plea that petition is malicious as landlord did..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i)(a) -- Landlord running commission agent business and seeking eviction of tenant from the shop to start business of karyana merchant - Held, Rent Controller shall not proceed to presume that the alleged need is not bonafide when landlord required tenanted premises to expand his business - His need must be..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(3)(a)(i) -- Landlord running commission agent business and seeking eviction of tenant from the shop to start business of karyana merchant - Tenant contended that landlord was having alternative accommodation in the shape of 14 other HUF shops in the same city - Held, it will not debar the landlord to get the demised..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B -- NRI landlord sought eviction of tenant on the ground of personal necessity - Tenant contended that landlord was in possession of other shops as well in the vicinity out of which four shops were lying vacant and consequently, the need of landlord, could not be said to genuine - Contention of tenant held..........
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 7, 13 -- Shamlat Deh - Gram Panchayat moved application u/s 7 of the Act - Assistant Collector seeking eviction of petitioners on the ground that they are unauthorized occupants - Petitioners denied that land was shamlat deh, but taking plea that they are the owners of the same - Assistant Collector converted..........
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13(1) -- Eviction petition on ground of arrears of rent - Provisional rent assessed - Extension of time to pay - Rent Controller has no jurisdiction to extend the time to make deposit of the amount as assessed by the Rent Controller beyond the period already fixed by the Rent Controller while assessing the rent...........
