Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 10 -- Stay of subsequent suit - Earlier suit filed by plaintiff is for declaration and permanent injunction and subsequent suit filed by defendant is for possession - Relief sought in both the suits is different, thus, it would not operate as res judicata - Application rightly rejected...........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Permanent injunction - DW1 admitted that plaintiffs were in possession of suit property and that defendants were not in possession of same - Courts below were duly justified in granting a decree of permanent injunction restraining defendant from interfering in possession of plaintiffs over suit property - Suit rightly decreed...........
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 102 -- Burden of proof - Injunction suit - When suit is filed by plaintiff for injunction claiming that he is in possession, it is for him to prove that he is in possession of property on the date of filing of suit...........
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 102 -- Burden of proof - Suit for damages and injunction - Plaintiff in his cross-examination admitted that he was in possession of key of lock which is locked to the gate of property in dispute - When such a fact is pleaded by plaintiff, it is for him to prove such a fact and defendant cannot enter into issue and ask for production of key -..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Ex-parte interim injunction - An ex-parte interim injunction order is passed only in case of grave urgency after considering principles governing grant or refusal of injunction and analyzing pleadings and documents on record, that too for a specified period - Court should also take an undertaking from plaintiff that if..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 11(2), (As -(As applicable in State of Maharashtra) - Defence struck off on ground of breach of injunction by defendant - Restoration of defence - Violation of ad interim injunction - Defendant executed sale deed in violation of ad interim injunction order - Said sale deed is not cancelled - Defendant received part consideration..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Suit for possession by pre-emption and permanent injunction - Disputed common way was purchased by plaintiff vide sale deed - Defendants had been given right to use common way as a licensee - However, defendant would not use the disputed common way, as plaintiff had already locked it - Suit dismissed...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Status quo order - Once suit for permanent injunction was decreed, defendants had been restrained from interfering in the possession of plaintiffs, operation of judgment decree rightly not stayed - However, once first appeal was under consideration of Court, proper way to deal with the matter was to pass an order directing..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for permanent injunction - Plaintiffs are title holder of suit land - Vendors of defendant admitted possession of vendor of plaintiffs over suit land in complaint case - Defendants thus, cannot claimed that they are in possession of suit land - Concurrent findings of Courts below that plaintiffs being title..........
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Suit for permanent injunction simplicitor - Suit is maintainable, as plaintiffs are title holders of suit property...........
