Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - 40% permanent disability - Total compensation - Keeping in view the age of appellant 51 years at the time of accident, multiplier of 11, future prospects 30%, permanent disability 40% and other heads under which appellant is entitled to compensation, total compensation of Rs.17,82,825 awarded to appellant with interest as..........
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Compensation - Split multiplier cannot be applied unless specific reasons are recorded...........
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Compensation - Multiplier - Deceased was 57-58 years at the time of accident - Application of multiplier 9 by Tribunal is proper...........
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Total compensation - Multiplier - Deceased was 57-58 years of age at the time of accident - Considering the age of deceased, appellant would be entitled to future prospects @ 15% and on account of loss of estate and funeral expenses, amount of Rs.15,000 each awarded by High Court is as per law and as far as loss of..........
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Compensation - Determination of monthly income - Notifications under Minimum Wages Act can be a guiding factor in cases where there is no evidence available to evaluate monthly income...........
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Total compensation - Keeping in view age of appellant, income @ Rs.6850, Multiplier of 17, 80% functional disability and other heads under which appellant is entitled to compensation, total compensation of Rs.20,55,452, awarded to appellant...........
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Compensation - Income of deceased - Income Tax returns are reliable evidence to assess the income of deceased...........
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Compensation - Loss of future income/earnings - Death of both the parents who were running the Mill - Merely because appellants steps into the shoes of their parents/deceased by such factum itself, appellants would not be capable of running the Mill and same is not a ground to reduce the compensation - It would be of..........
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Compensation - Determination of income of deceased - Deceased was doing wholesale business of selling fruits - Claimants were not able to prove the income of deceased - However, taking into account the Notification of 2016 under Minimum Wages Act, monthly income of an unskilled worker was fixed @ Rs.6500 - Consequently,..........
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 -- Accident - Compensation - Multiplier - Deceased was 24 years of age at the time of accident - Multiplier of 18 as per Pranay Sethi case is thus, appropriate...........
