LawMirror.com

Results of injunction+breach

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 2671-2680 of 4727 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2-A, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 -- Disobedience or breach of order of injunction - Application U.O.39.R.2-A CPC filed - Writ petition also filed to obtain similar order as would be passed by Civil Court - Held, Civil Procedure Code is a comprehensive Code to protect the interest of any party against the party..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 32 -- Execution - Decree for permanent injunction - D.H. complaining interference by JD in his possession - Executing Court dismissed execution application observing the revenue entries and report of Superintendent of Police do not support possession of DH - Order of executing court set aside - Held, judgment of competent civil..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 39, Rule 1,2, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Ex parte report of local commissioner - Evidentiary value - Suit for permanent injunction - Commissioner appointed to conduct spot inspection at the behest of plaintiff, without notice to defendants - Advocate commissioner who..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Article 64, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 7 -- Adverse possession, alternative plea, inconsistent plea - Suit for injunction and fixation of boundary - Defendant claimed title in respect of suit property under oral agreement of sale allegedly executed with predecessor of plaintiff - Held, plea of adverse possession taken by such defendants..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 32 -- Execution - Decree for permanent injunction - Can be executed by D.H. or his legal representatives against J.D. or transferee of J.D. who is a purchaser pendente lite...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 37, 38, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 32 -- Decree for injunction - Decree is a decree in personam and it does not run with the land - However, decree for perpetual injunction can be executed U.O.21.R.32 CPC by attachment of property of J.D. or by detention in civil prison or by both...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 2, Rule 2 -- Bar of second suit - Earlier suit filed for permanent and mandatory injunction and second suit for declaration, permanent injunction, recovery of possession and mesne profits - Earlier suit withdrawn but no liberty granted to file a fresh suit on the same cause of action - Plea that relief of possession could have been claimed..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 2, Rule 2 -- Subsequent suit - Bar U.O.2.R.2 CPC - Earlier suit for permanent and mandatory injunction praying that present petitioner be restrained from selling and using the property in question - Present suit has been filed by respondent No.1 for declaration, permanent injunction, recovery of possession and mesne profit/damages -..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 41(4) -- Injunction suit - Alternative remedy - Remedy to file suit for specific performance of sale agreement accrued to the plaintiff - Plaintiff filed suit for injunction - Held, suit for injunction is barred u/s 41 (4) of the Act when equally efficacious remedy is available to the plaintiff to file suit for enforcement of sale..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1 -- Injunction - Plaintiff developer has instead of paying anything for purchasing development rights received Rs.12,000,00/- from defendant society which is consistent with payment being towards construction cost - Held, appellant could not claim to have been put in possession - MOU entered into in 1994 - Till 2008 not a brick..........

Showing : 2671-2680 of 4727 Results