Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Travel agent - Air ticket - Purchase of for complainant-appellants on confessional basis - Intimation not given that group had to return together - Appellants had to cut short their journey, without fulfilling their purpose of visit, which caused them much mental harassment and agony - Held that there was..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14 -- Compensation - Interest -Section 14 of the CP Act empowers the District Forum to award compensation as to the loss or injury suffered by a consumer on account of negligence on the part of the O.P. - The interest is payable only in cases where there is any such term of contract for payment of interest...........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Vehicle finance - Hire Purchase Agreement - Non-payment of due instalments - Re-possession of vehicle as per the terms of the agreement - it does not amount to deficiency in service...........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A -- Limitation - Bundle of printed books booked for transportation on 10.03.1999 - Documents from Bank received by appellant in August,1999 containing GR and bill of the books informing that these documents are not being retired by the party to whom the delivery was to be made - Complaint filed on 11.06.2001 - Held to be filed..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer -Commercial purpose - Seeds - Purchased by respondent to raise crop in his agricultural land for his livelihood - The contention of the appellant that respondent was not a consumer because he had purchased seeds for commercial purpose repelled - Held that had the respondent purchased the seeds for further sale of..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2) -- Territorial jurisdiction - Seeds - Purchase of - From respondent No.2 who was agent of the appellant and has office at Delhi - The appellant was working through its agent at Delhi for gain - District Forum Delhi held well within its competence to entertain the complaint...........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2) -- Territorial jurisdiction - Seeds - Purchase of - From respondent No.2 who was agent of the appellant and has office at Delhi - The appellant was working through its agent at Delhi for gain - District Forum Delhi held well within its competence to entertain the complaint...........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer -Commercial purpose - Seeds - Purchased by respondent to raise crop in his agricultural land for his livelihood - The contention of the appellant that respondent was not a consumer because he had purchased seeds for commercial purpose repelled - Held that had the respondent purchased the seeds for further sale of..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2) -- Territorial jurisdiction -Insurance claim - No part of insurance contract made at Jhunjhunu -Complainant as well as respondents both do not hail from Jhunjunu nor their business nor any branch office of respondent was situated there - Simply because accident had taken place in the territorial jurisdiction of Jhunjhnu, it..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14, Contract Act, 1872, Section 50, 182 -- Deficiency in service - Cheques towards maturity amount sent by post by UTI - Cheques intercepted and fraudulently encashed by opening new accounts in banks/post offices in the names of payee and thereafter money was withdrawn - Plea of UTI that there was no negligence on its part..........
