Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Concurrent finding of fact as the reasonable requirement of premises insufficiency or inadequacy or improper appraisal of evidence interference by High Court - Mere insufficiency or inadequacy or improper appraisement of evidence in coming to a finding on such fact as to reasonable requirement cannot involve any error of law so as..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Concurrent finding of fact - Cannot be challenged in second appeal...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100, 101 -- Second appeal - Legal necessity to sell, a question of fact - Erroneous concurrent finding by the court below, can be set aside in second appeal...........
Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, Section 84 -- Revisio, Concurrent finding of subordinate Revenue Officers - Decision not according to law - Interference in revision justified. The Financial Commissioner can interfere in revision with concurrent finding of the subordinate Revenue Officers, when he is of the view that the subordinate Revenue Officers have not examined the case in..........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 9 -- Suit for permanent injunction restraining defendants from obstructing free flow of light and air - Suit schedule open space belonging to Municipality - Concurrent finding of fact in favour of plaintiff after appraisal of evidence that absence of impleading Municipality would not be fatal to suit - Cannot be disturbed in second..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent finding - Medical negligence - Treatment for dislocation of left elbow of son of the respondent on 8.2.1998 and reduction done and hard plaster applied to fix dislocation - X - ray of the affected portion taken on 11.4.1998 showed the dislocation of same elbow at same place - Plea that..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) -- Revisional Jurisdiction - Concurrent of findings of fact - Insurance claim - Repudiation - Finding of fact by the Fora below that the complainant was unable to establish that the tractor in question was stolen , while on its journey on 23.5.2000 during the currency of Insurance Policy from 16.5.2000 to 15.5.2001 and not on..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Seeds - Defective Jawar seeds - Failure of crop - Compensation - Concurrent findings - Revisional jurisdiction - Fora below recorded concurrent findings regarding the total loss of crop to the respondent - District Forum has given its finding as regards the amount of compensation after considering the facts..........
