LawMirror.com

Results of recall+of+ex+parte+order

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 271-280 of 777 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 145(2) -- Dishonour of cheque - Evidence of complainant by way of affidavit - Cross examination of deponent - Reasons need to be assigned to seek cross-examination of deponent - It is obligatory for Court to recall complainant or its witnesses, if an application is made in that behalf - Moreover, no prejudice, whatsoever,..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Recall of PW for further cross-examination - Murder case - Doctor not cross-examined as regards MLR of another co-accused - Both accused and co-accused are charged with same offence u/s 302 IPC - No prejudice thus, caused to accused simply by recalling doctor once for cross-examination on limited issue - Application filed by..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125 -- Maintenance to wife - Opportunity to cross-examine wife - Leaving a wife uncross-examined is likely to result in creating obstacle in correctly appreciating evidence - Liability of delay cannot be laid squarely on shoulders of husband, as there have been many dates on which even wife did not appear in the Court - Since matter..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 362 -- Recall of judgment - Amounts to alteration or review of judgment which is not permissible u/s 362 Cr.P.C...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17 -- Additional evidence - Rebuttal - Recall of witness - Plaintiff examined patwari but he failed to bring official record with respect to khasra girdawari and pedigree table and for this plaintiff cannot be found fault with - At rebuttal stage, application has been made in time to examine concerned daftar kanungo who will bring..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1)(ib) -- Divorce - Desertion - Petition by husband - Husband not taken any steps to recall wife - Wife has a key of house of husband where she could come and take her jewellery - Relationship of husband and wife is not severed completely and wife has given evidence that she has been discharging matrimonial duties - Wife still has an..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 7 -- Ex parte order - Setting aside - Defendants were not present on relevant date despite sufficient service - Trial Court proceeded ex parte against defendants - It was still open to defendants to appear before next date and participate in remaining proceedings - However, defendants chose to remain absent and ultimately filed..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 14 -- Order passed u/s 14 of the Act - Power of District Magistrate to review - District Magistrate does not have any jurisdiction to either review, recall or modify his own order much less to grant injunction...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 14 -- Order passed by District Magistrate - Jurisdiction to review his own order - District Magistrate does not have any power to recall, review or modify his own order or the order passed by his/her predecessor...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311 -- Dishonour of cheque - Recall of complainant for cross examination - Despite last opportunity granted to petitioner, he failed to place on record the evidence - However, on next date of hearing, Presiding Officer was on leave - Trial Court should have considered the application u/s..........

Showing : 271-280 of 777 Results