LawMirror.com

Results of appeal plaintiff

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 21-30 of 784 Results

GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for declaration, recovery of possession, mesne profits and permanent injunction - Defendants had duly admitted title of plaintiff over suit land - Though defendant claimed that there was a gratification of land in his favour, but there is no evidence adduced in support thereof - Documents of title of plaintiff..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Ad interim injunction - Suit land is joint and defendant was trying to usurp best portion of same without getting it partitioned as per plaintiff - However, defendant has raised a specific plea that suit land stood partitioned and partition had been implemented - Appeal filed against order of partition was dismissed in..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for perpetual and mandatory injunction - Framing of suit was not an issue before trial Court and first appellate Court - Non-suiting plaintiff by High Court on that ground is unsustainable - High Court ought to have accepted plaintiff's case by appreciating documents..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 5 -- Stay of execution - Decree for permanent injunction - Suit land is joint and had not been partitioned - Tubewell installed would hence also be used as a joint source of irrigation - Plaintiff who was a co-sharer, would also have a right to use electricity connection - Contention of defendant that since tubewell was installed..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for joint possession and permanent injunction - Plaintiffs have not been able to prove that suit properties were ancestral property - No documentary evidence has been pointed out to show that suit properties were coming through four male lineal descendants - Plaintiff has not been able to show how khasra..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Concurrent findings on record that plaintiff failed to prove that he is owner of suit property - Even qua construction of shop there was no cogent evidence led by plaintiff - Even, plaintiff stated in his cross-examination that he had no information as to whether any..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for declaration of ownership - Plaintiff failed to prove that she was legally wedded wife of original owner - Succession certificate granted in favour of plaintiff was subsequently revoked - Plaintiff even failed to prove that she is class-I heir of original owner - Suit rightly dismissed...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11, 100 -- Res judicata - Suits filed by plaintiff and defendant were tried jointly - Suit filed by plaintiff was dismissed and suit filed by defendant was decreed by trial Court - However, in first appeal suit of defendant was dismissed and plaintiff's suit decreed - Defendant has not filed second appeal against dismissal of his appeal..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for permanent injunction - Concurrent findings of fact on record that plaintiff had encroached upon some portion of Government land - Demarcation report is on record which shows that plaintiff had encroached upon government land - No evidence to disprove the said demarcation report was led by plaintiff nor any..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 28 -- Decree for specific performance - Doctrine of merger - Trial court while allowing suit for specific performance had specifically directed that plaintiff shall deposit balance sale consideration with Court within 20 days from date of judgment passed by trial Court - Contention that decree passed by trial Court can be affirmed by High..........

Showing : 21-30 of 784 Results