LawMirror.com

Results of execution dismissed default

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 21-30 of 44 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 105, 106 -- Execution - Restoration - Execution petition dismissed in default can be ordered to be restored - Contention that petition was dismissed and not dismissed in default - Order dismissing petition on the ground that non turned up on behalf of D.H. or J.D. - Order passed without prejudice to the right of D.H. or any other..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 57 -- Attachment - Ceases only when execution application is dismissed unless Court indicates that attachment shall continue - Execution petition when adjourned sine die or closed on account of any moratorium or stay of execution under a statute, or by an order of stay by any Court, or where execution application is closed without..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 26, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Execution of ex-parte money decree - Defendant moved application U.O.9.R.13 CPC which was dismissed - Contemporaneously, defendant also filed application U.O.21.R.26 CPC seeking stay of execution proceedings - Execution proceedings ordered to be stayed subject to defendant..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 35 -- Execution - Dismissed in default - Fresh application can be filed if same is not barred by limitation...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47 -- Execution - Eviction petition - Objections that execution petition is not filed within limitation - Execution petition was earlier filed which was dismissed in default - Execution Court dismissed the objection petition without deciding whether execution petition is filed within time and whether present execution petition is in..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47 -- Execution - Eviction petition - Objections that execution petition is not filed within limitation - Execution petition was earlier filed which was dismissed in default - Execution Court dismissed the objection petition without deciding whether execution petition is filed within time and whether present execution petition is in..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 90 -- Execution - Objections - Dismissed for default - Attached property ordered to be auctioned - Application for restoration of objections filed - Application for stay of auction rejected - Property auctioned - Execution pending for consideration of application for restoration of objections and also for submission of..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 10 -- Second execution application - Suit for possession decreed - Execution filed - Dismissed in default - Second execution application filed without restoration of the earlier application - Second application filed within limitation prescribed under Article 136 of Limitation Act - Second application maintainable - Limitation Act..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 21, Rule 10 -- Execution application dismissed in default - Not restored - Fresh execution application filed - Bar under O9 R9 precludes plaintiff from filing fresh suit - Provision of O9 R9 and R13 are not applicable to execution of decree when the rights of parties stands..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 21, Rule 106(1) -- Execution - Dismissal for default - Restoration - Date on which execution application was dismissed for default was fixed for putting up records and not a date fixed for hearing - Dismissal was not under rule 105(2) and therefore provision of R.106 is not attracted - There is no time limit prescribed for..........

Showing : 21-30 of 44 Results