LawMirror.com

Results of journal

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 21-30 of 34 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Copyright Act, 1957, Section 52 -- Copyright - Judgments of Courts - Published by one law journal and copied by another law journal - There is no copyright when Editor puts in inputs like, cross citations to the citations already given, added names of cases and cross-citations, inserted citation in case history, presented in their own style the cases when they are cited..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Copyright Act, 1957, Section 52 -- Copyright - Judgments of Courts - Published by one law journal and copied by another law journal - There is copyright when Editor puts in inputs like (i) segregating the existing paragraphs in the original text by breaking them into separate paragraphs; (ii) adding internal paragraph numbering within a judgment after providing uniform..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, Section 2(m), Copyright Act, 1957, Section 62 -- Trade mark, copyright and passing off - Jurisdiction - A cause of action for infringement of Copyright and a cause of action for infringement of Trade Mark or a cause of action of passing off is different - If a District Court, where plaintiff resides but where no cause of action..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439 -- Bail - Grant of - Jurisdiction to grant bail is to be exercised by keeping in mind the nature of accusations, nature of evidence in support thereof, the severity of the punishment which conviction will entail, the character, behaviour, means and standing of the accused, circumstances which are peculiar to the accused,..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consent decree -- Plaintiff and defendant strangers - No family settlement proved - No pre-existing right - Right created by decree for first time - Decree not registered as immovable property of more than Rs.100/- - Finding of lower Courts that decree has no legal force & not binding - Upheld. 1996(1) Civil Court Cases 210 (S.C.) : 1996(1) Apex Court Journal 71 (S.C.)..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGRH

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Law -- Refund - Cheque for subscription of Law Journal accepted and got encashed but the journal subscribed neither received nor amount of subscription refunded - Appellant-OP led no evidence showing the supply of journal - Order of the District Forum directing OP to refund the amount of subscription with interest @8% p.a. upheld...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2002
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2) -- Territorial Jurisdiction - Cheque received from petitioner complainant by a bookseller at Kaithal sent to first respondent at Nabha in the name of Law Journal published from Nabha - There is no branch of the first respondent at Kaithal - Merely sending cheque from Kaithal will not confer jurisdiction at District Forum Kaithal..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34(3) -- Proviso - S.5 Limitation Act does not apply to proceedings under S.34 of the Arbitration Act, 1996 for setting aside arbitral award though it applies to proceedings u/s 30 of old Act of 1940. (2001(2) Apex Court Journal 385 (S.C.) followed.) (Limitation Act, 1963, S.5)...........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2001
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Pre-mature filing of complaint - Complaint not to be dismissed - It can await maturity or be returned to the complainant for filing later and mere presentation at an earlier date need not necessarily render the complaint liable to be dismissed or confer any right upon the accused to absolve himself from..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1999
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- 'No instructions' - Pleaded by counsel - Defendant proceeded exparte - Notice not given to defendant - Defendant is not at fault - Exparte decree set aside. (1998(2) Civil Court Cases 83 (S.C.) : 1998(1) Apex Court Journal 211 (S.C.) followed.)..........

Showing : 21-30 of 34 Results