LawMirror.com

Results of order+8+rule+9+civil procedure code

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 21-30 of 10994 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2026
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 11, Rule 21 -- Provision of O.11.R.21 CPC confines its applicability within the four corners i.e., failure of a party to comply with any order to : (i) answer interrogatories; (ii) make discovery of documents; and (iii) permit inspection of documents - Only in such eventualities question of striking out defence in case of defendants or..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2026
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 11, Rule 21(1) -- Applicability of provision U.O.11.R.21(1) CPC - Proceeding cannot be initiated U.O.11.R.21(1) CPC in case of non-compliance of order passed U.O.11.R.14 CPC...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2026
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 11, Rule 21(1) -- Applicability of provision of O.11.R.21(1) CPC - Until and unless defendants were in a position to show that there was an order passed U.O.11.R.12 CPC and there was non-compliance thereof, provision of O.11.R.21(1) CPC could not have been invoked by defendants...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2026
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Interim injunction - Interim order which recognizes or confers possession and effectively decides main controversy amounts to virtually decreeing suit at an interlocutory stage, which is impermissible in law - Impugned order set aside - Parties directed to maintain status quo with respect to suit property...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2026
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 32 -- Execution - Decree for permanent injunction - Executing Court instead of examining whether there was willful disobedience of decree and whether remedial measures U.O.21.R.32(5) CPC were warranted dismissed execution petition on the ground that no specific date of dispossession was disclosed and that photographic evidence was..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2026
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151 -- Recall of order - Order striking off defence - Order recalled subject to payment of cots - Costs accepted - Once plaintiff accepted the costs, he is estopped from challenging said order allowing application u/s 151 CPC - Order allowing application u/s 151 CPC upheld...........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2026
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 8, 9 -- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Non revealing of source of information regarding dismissal of suit - A litigant who does not state exact date of knowledge and source of knowledge regarding passing of an order, and in cases where there is no other material found from record to arrive at a conclusion regarding..........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2026
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 8, 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Condonation of delay - Plaintiff is not disclosing his source of information and date of knowledge about impugned order from whom he found that suit is dismissed for default - Therefore, Court can draw an inference that plaintiffs had knowledge..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2026
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 498A -- Summoning of additional accused - Offence u/s 498-A IPC - Allegations of cruelty and harassment in connection with alleged monetary demand attributed with clarity and consistency to husband and father-in-law - However, no specific overt act, date, instance, conversation or independent..........

TELANGANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2026
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 24 -- Transfer of case - Mere apprehension of adverse order cannot be a ground for transfer...........

Showing : 21-30 of 10994 Results