LawMirror.com

Results of partition suit

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 21-30 of 1353 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11 -- Rejection of plaint - Suit for possession/eviction - Plaintiff is claiming ownership over shop in question on the basis of preliminary partition decree - Admittedly, preliminary decree cannot be questioned by defendants as they have no locus standi to challenge the same being tenants and has not alleged that preliminary..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Partition suit -- Settlement deed - Father of plaintiff and defendant Nos.2 to 4 executed a registered settlement deed in their favour and by virtue of said settlement deed, plaintiff is having 1/4th undivided share in suit property - However, defendant Nos. 2 to 4 alienated entire suit property to defendant No.1 under a registered sale deed - Defendant No.1 also without..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Will -- Suspicious circumstance - Execution of Will in favour of daughter - Plaintiff is second wife of testator having her own income - Defendant is daughter of first wife of testator and his only offspring, who lost her mother immediately after her birth - It is quite natural that such a father shows more affection to his daughter - Conduct of testator in deciding to..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Hindu Law -- Joint Family Property - Alienation by Karta - Karta sold the suit property to defendant No.5 to meet expenses of marriage of daughter i.e due to legal necessity - Money receipts for sale consideration were signed by two of coparceners, as well as wife of Karta and daughter, whose marriage expenses are stated to be reason for sale - These circumstances..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11 -- Rejection of plaint - Partition suit - Father of plaintiff acquired property by way of partition that took place in 1986, which fell in his hands as his self-acquired property - Admittedly, plaintiff does not fall in any of categories of Class I heirs of grandfather as prescribed u/s 8 of Hindu Succession Act and inheritance..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Ancestral property - Partition has not taken place and if without any partition, transfer of disputed property is done, then same would amount to multiplicity as well as complexity of litigation - Application allowed. ( Paras 7 & 8)..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 114, Order 47, Rule 1 -- Review - Impugned order of allowing review petition has not adverted to an error apparent on the face of record, but has taken up an error on re-appreciation of case and counter case of parties - Review order records a few findings extending far beyond actual working out of prayers in a suit for partition - Order..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 6 -- Right of daughter - Partition suit - Suit lands cannot be said to be coparcenary property of plaintiff - Those are coparcenary property of her mother - But mother is not coming forward claiming partition - Plaintiff has not acquired any birth right - Therefore, there is no unobstructed..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Article 110 -- Limitation - Partition suit - Plea of ouster - If the Co-sharer in possession, raises the plea of ouster or bar u/art 110 of the Act, it is incumbent on such co-sharer to prove that exclusion was to the knowledge of other co-sharers - Exclusion should be proved by tangible evidence - One cannot infer exclusion from enjoyment of..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Partition -- Plaintiff had no knowledge about execution of partition deed of 1990 as alleged by defendants - Moreover, plaintiff is not a party to said partition deed - Courts below has rightly held that defendants failed to establish that plaintiff has received a sum of Rs.10,000 towards her share - As regarding plea of ouster taken by defendants, in the absence of..........

Showing : 21-30 of 1353 Results